Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

BSAO – Challenging the Ariba Integration on ECC 6.0 (EHP 8)


This post is for everyone who considers to integrate with the Ariba Network using SAP ECC 6.0 (non S/4HANA). It should help to find a smooth start and to avoid some major obstacles and give some guidance to beginners.

What to consider?

ERP Integration Suite Add-on vs. SAP Cloud Integration Gateway (CIG)?

Be aware that current announce end of mainstream maintenance for the Ariba Integration Suite 1.0 is 31.12.2019. Please check SAP PAM for most up to date information.

SAP announced in the open sap course (see resources) that the Cloud Integration Gateway (CIG) will replace the Integration Suite Add-on (Week 3 – Unit 3: Setting Up Cloud Integration – 00:05:23) .

“CIG will replace the Business Suite add-on completely going forward, following the same logic as outlined before: Everything packaged in CIG – upgrades, bugfixes, innovations delivered in the cloud by SAP and SAP Ariba – and of course monitoring is provided by CIG.” (by Rolf Weiland)

At the time of the creation of the blog there is only very few information on the CIG available. The help page exists already, but does not contain any information yet. On you find a little presentation on CIG for Buyers.

What’s the right choice?

This question came up my mind and the answer is not easy, I think. Moreover it could only be a subjective one. From my point of view the “old” ERP Add-on is missing some essential features (e.g. no tax on item level, no sold-to party in invoice, etc. These features have to be implemented by every customer itself). As the end of maintenance is already announced and it is in less than 2 years, it is questionable if SAP will develop an further improvements (or even make corrections, not just workarounds).

On the other hand there is not (yet) much information on the CIG available. Moreover it does not yet support cXML (atleast that is what I was told). But this solution seems to be much closer to what SAP is doing in S4/HANA regarding Ariba Integration.

So, if I had to make the choice again, I would wait a little more to what the future will bring.

Error handling – FEH or AIF?

First of all I recommend you to check these to blogs, as they helped me to get into this topic.

  • POV: FEH or AIF or Custom Error Handling
  • Michal’s Tips: SXMB_MONI vs FEH/ECH vs AIF

As SAP AIF is another add-on I checked availability on SAP PAM first. End of maintenance support is currently announced for 31.12.2020, so this would fit with the Ariba add-on. Nevertheless it is one more add-on to care about when “converting” to S/4HANA.


  • SCN –> check blogs by Joe Dutra (wrote 10+ blogs, especially from buyer point of view) and Vijay Vital … and last but not least my other blogs on Ariba!
  • SAP –> e.g. SAP help for Ariba Integration Suite and first information on CIG for example at ARIBA CLOUD INT SAP ERP 1.0 ( go to SAP Software Download Center – By category – SAP CLOUD SOLUTIONS – ARIBA CLOUD INT SAP ERP and click on “Info” tab…as there is the only information available at the time of the creation of this post)
  • DSAG (German equivalent of US ASUG) user meetings or Ariba Live (next up in Las Vegas)
  • Procurement Transformation with SAP Ariba and SAP S/4HANA on

Known Bugs / Limitations

  • If you receive a 406 http error message “not accepted” when trying to send documents, this is most likely due to fact that flag “Optimized XML transfer” is set in OADP_OUT. Deactivate optimization and this should be fixed.
  • If you receive a 400 http error message saying some like this:              When sending an OrderConfirmation this is most like due to “known limitation”. Here is what SAP support says:

The issue is related to inconsistent Timestamp sent out to ariba
network. Since there is a difference of timestamp between purchase
order and sales order, in the other word, the buyer and seller. This
is a known function limitation in SAP. Unfortunately, we don’t have a
standard solution to resolve this issue as of now. It means that the
timestamp is not stored anywhere in the inbounding process at seller’s

However, there is a workaround for this issue. This workaround is also
implemented by other SAP customer previously. Since ariba network does
not check the existence of order date field, meaning that it accepts a
empty value of order data. In your customized code, please set the
order date to ” “.


According to our BNS-ARI-TRF colleague, the orderDate attribute of the
OrderReference element is optional. If skipping theorderDate by not
filling it with value works, this can be a potential standard solution.

Please understand this is a known limitation, and we apologize for any
inconvenience caused by this limitation.

  • If you receive message 011 ARBERP_MAP_SD for an incoming (sales) order, this could be due to the fact that you set a delivery block for sales orders created by Ariba in customizing AND the system wants to create a delivery directly when saving the order (this could be set up in customizing (flag V_TVAK-LISOF in customizing of sales order types) or be done in an userexit). In this case the Ariba Add-on does not recognize that a sales order was created. See class CL_ARBERP_BUS2032_ORDR_IN  method call_application_interface.
     if lt_return is not initial.
        field-symbols  type bapiret2.
        loop at lt_return assigning .
          move-corresponding  to ls_arbfnd_bapiret2_msg.
          if -number eq lc_so_number_provided.
            ls_order_number-object_key = -message_v2.
            append ls_order_number to et_object_key_int.

    The system uses message V1 311 (&1 &2 has been saved) to recognize if a sales order was created or not. But in this case, message V1 261 (&1 &2 has been saved (no delivery created)) would be issued for example.

Lesson learned

  • Choose your pilot customer / supplier carefully and try to find one who is using an up to date version of Ariba (and the corresponding cXML version). The benefit is, that the provided cXML documents should meet the current cXML specs and there shouldn’t be many extrinsic fields for elements which weren’t included in former cXML specs but now are included.
  • Don’t hesitate to use the Community for best practices, information and if problems occur. If this does not solve your issue, an incident with SAP support needs to be created.

I hope this blog was helpful for you. Please feel free to ask questions. Moreover I invite you to share your opinion and solutions!

Best regards,


This post first appeared on Web Service Testing A Blackjack GUI And API, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

BSAO – Challenging the Ariba Integration on ECC 6.0 (EHP 8)


Subscribe to Web Service Testing A Blackjack Gui And Api

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription