In the latest publication from an Isis magazine a number of highly controversial statements were made that will horrify most Americans.  Many on the left will still contend that this has nothing to do with Islam. Nevertheless, every observation was reportedly backed up with quotes from the Quran and Muhammad.

The ISIS leaders contend that America would be far different if Muslims had been in charge:

“The Islamic leadership would not have bypassed Allah’s permission to sell captured pagan humans, to teach them, and to convert them, as they worked hard for their masters in building a beautiful country,…”

“The Japanese, for example, would have been forcefully converted to Islam from their pagan ways – and if they stubbornly declined, perhaps another nuke would change their mind. The Vietnamese would likewise be offered Islam or beds of napalm.”

As for the Native Americans, the article continues, after the slaughter of their men, “then the Muslims would have taken their surviving women and children as slaves, raising the children as model Muslims and impregnating their women to produce a new generation of mujahidin.” …

“As for the treacherous Jews of Europe and elsewhere – those who would betray their covenant – then their post-pubescent males would face a slaughter that would make the Holocaust sound like a bedtime story, as their women would be made to serve their husbands’ and fathers’ killers.”

Response: In the same magazine, the leaders of the Islamic State clearly proclaim their intention to destroy Christianity and eventually force all Christian to convert to Islam or be killed. They believe along with most Muslims that Jesus (‘Isa) will come back and demand that all Christians convert.

By the way, this is not a unique teaching of ISIS but an end-time teaching of mainstream Islam which is believed by nearly all Muslims. The idea that all Jewish males should be killed in a new world-wide holocaust also is not a minority view among Muslims, particularly in the Middle East. As far as slavery goes, it is alive and well today among some Muslims including ISIS and the Boko Haram. Even in countries where it is illegal. A Saudi princess was charged with having a number of ‘slaves’ in her household in California but the charges were dropped after considerable pressure was applied from Saudi Arabian diplomats.

Point is-  the ISIS views represented in this magazine may sound outrageous to most Americans but they are not at all unique among Muslims and may even reflect a far greater number in the Middle East than any supposed ‘expert’ in the Obama Administration will want to admit. Meanwhile, according to a poll taken by the Al Jazeera Arabic TV channel, 81% of their viewers in the Middle East and North Africa actually support ISIS. Scary but true. 

In light of that kind of support and all of the problems that countries in Europe are having with recent immigrants from Syria and the Middle East, is it really wise to bring in hundreds of thousands of additional Muslim refugees from the Middle East like Hillary Clinton is proposing without some kind of screening process? Also, why is the current administration allowing mostly Muslim refugees into the country while the Christians refugees, who are in greater danger and suffer even greater persecution, continue to be substantially rejected?  This really doesn’t make any sense at all.              *Top