Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Defining an implementation independent version of the global object in JavaScript

Defining an implementation independent version of the global object in JavaScript


I'm trying to define the global object in JavaScript in a single line as follows:

var global = || this;

The above statement is in the global scope. Hence in browsers the this pointer is an alias for the window object. Assuming that it's the first line of JavaScript to be executed in the context of the current web page, the value of global will always be the same as that of the this pointer or the window object.

In CommonJS implementations, such as RingoJS and node.js the this pointer points to the current ModuleScope. However, we can access the global object through the property global defined on the ModuleScope. Hence we can access it via the property.

Hence this code snippet works in all browsers and in at least RingoJS and node.js, but I have not tested other CommomJS implementations. Thus I would like to know if this code will not yield correct results when run on any other CommonJS implementation, and if so how I may fix it.

Eventually, I intend to use it in a lambda expression for my implementation independent JavaScript framework as follows (idea from jQuery):

(function (global) {
    // javascript framework
})( || this);
Problem courtesy of: Aadit M Shah


After reading Esailija and Raynos' answers I understood that my code || this will not work for all cases in node.js; and that it may even fail in browsers if a variable called global already exists in the global scope.

Esailija pointed out that is not really the global object, stating instead that this is the global object in RingoJS; and although I understand his arguments, for my purposes I require and not this.

Raynos suggested that I hard code feature detection for every CommonJS environment. However since I'm currently only supporting RingoJS and node.js, I only need to test for global and window. Hence I decided to stick with || this.

Nevertheless, as I said before || this doesn't work for all cases in node.js as I understood from benvie's comments. In the node.js REPL I realized that I require this and not However, || this expresses In a node.js module I require and not this. However, it expresses this since is undefined. Hence to solve this problem I finally decided to use the following code:

(function (global) {
    // javascript framework
})(typeof global !== "undefined" && global || this);

The reason I'm using this code is because in node.js modules is undefined. Hence we must use global directly. Thus we use typeof global !== "undefined" && global to get the global object in both RingoJS and node.js; and we use this as the global object in browsers (window) and as a default fallback.

Note: I didn't provide any logic for finding the global object in the node.js REPL because I don't believe that my framework will be used directly within the REPL anyway. However, writing the logic to find it should be fairly trivial once one understands the complications of finding the global object in node.js as benvie pointed out. I know that I don't.

Solution courtesy of: Aadit M Shah


View additional discussion.

This post first appeared on Node.js Recipes, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Defining an implementation independent version of the global object in JavaScript


Subscribe to Node.js Recipes

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription