BEVERLY HILLS, March 16, (THEWILL) – The former Senate majority leader, Senator Ali Ndume, has insisted that if the Senate could refuse to confirm Ibrahim Magu, as Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) based on allegations levelled against him, then, Bukola Saraki, who also has a case in court should not be the Senate President.
Ndume, speaking on Sunrise Daily, a breakfast programme on Channels Television, faulted the decision of the senate to reject the nomination of Magu based on a report of the Department of State Services (DSS) which alleged that Magu was unfit to lead the commission because he had failed an integrity test.
“We have all been accused, I have been accused of sponsoring Boko Haram, the senate president is still going to court,” Ndume, a former Governor of Borno state said.
“Same as other members who have cases in court, yet they occupy seats in the senate. So, if you say because of the allegations he (Magu) should not be confirmed, then I should not be a sitting senator and Saraki should not be there as senate president.”
Ndume also declared that he was sure that President Muhammadu Buhari did not mention Magu’s confirmation during his last meeting with leaders of the national assembly when he met Saraki and Yakubu Dogara, Speaker of the House of Representatives, at the presidential villa in Abuja, a day to the day Magu was rejected at the senate.
“The president I know is not the kind of person that would interfere in such matters. I would have been surprised if the president discussed the issue of confirmation when he met the leaders of the national assembly recently, that would have led to the issue of lobbying for him to be confirmed,” he said.
“There is no crime against lobbying, in fact we are supposed to lobby. I lobbied most of the senators but sometimes you keep on learning because this is kind of new.
“A government where you (APC) are in the majority and the president re-nominates a candidate, and also in a situation where the issue at stake is an accusation; in the normal circumstance and by our constitution, accusation is not conviction.
“The issue now is not the house in his name, it’s a house called the safe house and that was prompted because after his acting appointment and the rigorous work he is doing, you can’t afford to have somebody like that living in Karu or a densely populated area.
“The bottom line is that we are trying to fight against corruption and if we ask: ‘is Magu doing his job?’ the answer is yes, undoubtedly.
“He is not an actor, he is a policeman doing investigation. He is not supposed to talk about what his job is in an articulate manner, it’s not important. What he is doing is not a TV show.”