July 24th 2017

Trending Videos CBSN Live »

CBSN

Parents of Charlie Gard drop legal case
Newsmakers

The Brothers Rosenberg
CBS This Morning

Human trafficking tragedy
CBS This Morning

Kushner: "I did not collude"
CBS This Morning

Changing Trump's message
CBS This Morning

Storms slam the midwest
CBS This Morning

Officer properly trained?
CBS This Morning

The abortion debate
CBS This Morning

Princes remember Diana
CBS This Morning

Florida family's search for justice
CBS This Morning

Murder mystery unsolved
CBS This Morning

What's next for O.J. Simpson?
CBS This Morning

Diet may impact MS symptoms
CBS This Morning

Workers make prehistoric discovery
CBS This Morning

Linda Fairstein on "Deadfall"
CBS Evening News

Scaramucci threatens action
CBS Evening News

Dickerson on Scaramucci
CBS Evening News

Bodies found inside truck
CBS Evening News

Kentucky's abortion clinic

World

Major twist in legal battle over critically ill baby Charlie Gard
World

German girl found in ISIS hideout wants "to go home"
World

Police hunt for chainsaw attacker after 5 wounded
World

Car bomb attack targeting police kills at least 12
World

Dozens killed in suicide car bomb attack
World

Jordan Spieth wins 2017 British Open
World

Jordanian killed, Israeli wounded in violent incident at Israeli embassy
World

William, Harry remember devastating last call with mother
World

American student arrested in China has been freed, senator says
World

Swiss couple buried after missing in Swiss Alps for 75 years
World

Taliban fighters seize 2 districts, kill police officers
World

Branden Grace shoots 62 to break golf record

Last Updated Jul 24, 2017 3:19 PM EDT

LONDON — The parents of Charlie Gard, whose battle to get their critically ill baby experimental treatment stirred international sympathy and controversy, dropped their legal effort Monday, saying tearfully that it was time to let their son die.

What Is The Metaverse and Does It Hav…
Does Christianity really say wives su…
Trends and Tips for Improving Employe…
iHerb – 25% discount on Pet Health br…
Hollywoodian Beard & How It’ll Transf…

At an emotional court hearing, a lawyer for the baby's parents, Chris Gard and Connie Yates, said the couple was withdrawing a bid to have Charlie sent to the United States, where a doctor had offered to try to treat his rare genetic condition. The decision came after new medical tests showed Charlie, who has brain damage and cannot breathe unaided, had irreversible muscular damage.

CBS News correspondent Jane Ferguson reports the parents' decision was unexpected. Monday's proceedings were expected to include impassioned arguments in favor of taking Charlie to the U.S. and counterarguments from doctors who had said nothing could be done for him. A verdict in the case wasn't expected until Tuesday.

Both parents wept in the packed courtroom at the High Court in London as lawyer Grant Armstrong made the announcement, his voice breaking.

Play
Video

Video

Parents of critically ill U.K. baby withdraw request for U.S. treatment

The parents of Charlie Gard have dropped a months-long plea for their son to receive experimental treatment in the United States.

"This case is now about time," Armstrong said. "Sadly, time has run out."

Outside court, Chris Gard said that Charlie "won't make his first birthday in just under two weeks' time."

"We are about to do the hardest thing that we will ever have to do, which is to let our beautiful little Charlie go," he said.

Gard and Yates, who are in their 30s and from London, have fought ferociously for their son, who was born in August 2016 with mitochondrial depletion syndrome, a rare genetic disease.

The baby has been treated at Great Ormond Street Hospital in London, one of the world's leading children's hospitals. Doctors there say Charlie is in pain and further treatment would only increase his suffering. They have sought permission from the courts to switch off his life support and allow him to die peacefully. His parents have resisted, arguing that an experimental treatment could extend and improve Charlie's life.

The case gained international attention after Charlie's parents received support from Pope Francis, President Trump and some members of the U.S. Congress.

On Monday, the Vatican said Francis was praying for Charlie and his parents, and urged the faithful to join him in prayer so that the baby's parents "may find God's consolation and love."

As the legal battle dragged on, U.S.-based pro-life activists had flown to London to support Charlie's parents, and the case became a flashpoint for opposing views on health-care funding, medical intervention, the role of the state and the rights of the child.

Connie Yates with her son Charlie Gard

Passions have often run high, with activists demanding "justice for Charlie" rallying outside the High Court and Great Ormond Street Hospital. Over the weekend, the hospital said it had contacted police after staff received abuse and threats.

Charlie's parents condemned the abuse, and on Monday thanked the hospital for the care it had given their child.

Some commentators portrayed the case as a clash between family and the state, and U.S. conservatives used it to criticize Britain's government-funded health care system – even though the case was never about money.

Judge Nicholas Francis criticized those "who know almost nothing about this case but who feel entitled to express opinions."

At its heart, the case pitted the right of parents to decide what's best for their children against the authorities' responsibility to uphold the rights of people who can't speak for themselves.

Under British law, children have rights independent of their parents, and it is usual for courts to intervene when parents and doctors disagree on the treatment of a child – such as cases where a parent's religious beliefs prohibit blood transfusions.

British courts and the European Court of Human Rights all ruled against Charlie's parents and in favor of Great Ormond Street. The case returned to court this month when the hospital asked the judge to reassess the possible benefits of a treatment pioneered by Dr. Michio Hirano, a neurology expert from Columbia Medical Center in New York.

Undated photo of Charlie Gard provided by his family, at Great Ormond Street Hospital, in London.

At a hearing earlier this month, Hirano said there was a 10 percent chance of a significant improvement in Charlie's muscle use with the treatment, known as nucleoside therapy. But he conceded it had never been tried on humans, or even on mice with Charlie's exact condition.

Hirano came to London last week to examine Charlie along with other experts. After seeing the results of new tests, the baby's parents agreed to drop their case, meaning Charlie's life support can now be removed.

But they still believe Charlie could have been saved had months not been spent in legal wrangling about whether he should get treatment.

"Had Charlie been given the treatment sooner he would have had the potential to be a normal, healthy little boy," Yates told the court.

"Our son has an extremely rare disease for which there is no accepted cure, but that does not mean that this treatment would not have worked, and it certainly does not mean that this shouldn't have been tried."

The hospital disagreed. Its lawyer, Katie Gollop, said Charlie had suffered "irreversible neurological damage" and the treatment would have been "futile." She said the hospital stood by its belief that Charlie was in pain.

"At the first hearing in Charlie's case in March, (Great Ormond Street Hospital's) position was that every day that passed was a day that was not in his best interests," Gollop said in a written statement. "That remains its view of his welfare."

The hospital also criticized Hirano, saying that he had given evidence to court without having read previous judgments or Charlie's medical records. And it noted that Hirano had told the court that he "retains a financial interest in some of the … compounds he proposed prescribing for Charlie."

Ending a case he called tragic for all involved, the judge paid tribute to Charlie's parents, saying it was impossible to comprehend the agony they faced.

"No parent could have done more for their child," he said.

Yates cried as she told the court she and Charlie's father had only wanted the best for their son.

"We are so sorry that we couldn't save you," she said.

Featured in World

Ex-hedge fund manager founds school in Somaliland

Jonathan Starr tells "60 Minutes" that when he founded a school in struggling Somaliland, he gave students a “chance to win” and that’s exactly what they did
The Family: Stories from inside the cult led by self-proclaimed mystic Anne Hamilton-Byrne

Allegations of stolen children, drugs, abuse and a leader who claimed to be the second coming of Jesus Christ — "48 Hours" follows the trail of a cult that began in Australia and led the FBI to New York

CBSN Live

pop-out

From 60 Minutes

My favorite "60 Minutes" story
Sons of Cold War spies reinvestigate parents' case
Ex-Gov. Bob McDonnell on SCOTUS overturning his conviction
Why Bob McDonnell talked to "60 Minutes"
Should the U.S. government pay ransom money?

Play
Video

Linda Fairstein on "Deadfall"
Play
Video

Workers make prehistoric discovery
Play
Video

What's next for O.J. Simpson?
Play
Video

Whales in NYC
Play
Video

Marines return to Helmand
Play
Video

Western wildfires

43
Photos

Music, mud and marriage at Country Thunder 2017
32
Photos

John Heard 1945-2017
64
Photos

O.J. Simpson then and now
55
Photos

Cosplay at San Diego Comic-Con
59
Photos

Western wildfires

Why Bob McDonnell talked to 60 Minutes
Sneak peek: The Mortician, The Murder, The Movie
How Jack Black relates to the convicted killer he plays in the film "Bernie"
The August solar eclipse on your smartphone
Docs: Truck driver said he didn't know people were inside

New Fire TV App

The post Major twist in legal battle over Charlie Gard, critically ill UK baby appeared first on Shareabler - Shareable Stories.

This post first appeared on Shareabler, please read the originial post: here