The meeting of the "G-7," consisting of the world's most industrialized nations, took place in Hiroshima, Japan, with the intention of conveying a message of global solidarity for peace. Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, who hails from Hiroshima, aimed to emphasize this sentiment by bringing together the leaders of all G-7 members, along with EU representatives, at the peace memorial dedicated to the victims of the 1945 atomic bombing. During the summit, a special "Hiroshima Vision Statement on Nuclear Disarmament" was issued, further emphasizing its significance. Notably, President Joseph Biden of the United States, only the second sitting American President to visit the city, made a deliberate point of attending the summit. The unexpected presence of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy also helped draw attention to the horrors of Russia's invasion. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's statement characterizing the crisis as a matter of "humanity" carried considerable weight. While the G-7 members issued a separate statement on Ukraine, imposing additional sanctions on Russia, they failed to highlight a path towards dialogue and resolving the conflict. Despite extending invitations to countries like India, Brazil, Indonesia, and Vietnam, which have a more nuanced perspective on global affairs, and Prime Minister Kishida making references to the views of the Global South, the statements made during the summit predominantly reflected the perspectives of the G-7 members alone.

If the G-7 wishes to broaden its perspective, it must acknowledge that it inadequately represents the current global landscape. Although its members collectively possess more than half of the world's net wealth, the G-7 accounts for less than one-third of global GDP and just over a tenth of the world's population. Apart from Japan, the G-7 primarily consists of nations with a Euro-American worldview, and there are currently no discussions underway to expand its membership. In fact, it has contracted in size since it expelled Russia following its annexation of Georgian territories in 2008 and Crimea in 2014. It is difficult to justify an economic grouping that excludes some of the world's largest economies (such as China and India), the fastest-growing GDPs, and the largest global energy providers. Although the Hiroshima summit made some efforts to acknowledge the G-7's role in promoting transparent financing and debt sustainability for developing countries, as well as compensating for the developed world's contribution to global warming and greenhouse gas emissions, it failed to propose concrete measures to address these responsibilities. As the focus now shifts to the upcoming G-20 summit in Delhi later this year, there is hope that the grouping will strive for a more inclusive outlook and contribute to building a comprehensive global consensus on the significant challenges facing the world today.