Earlier lately, Kourtney Kardashian didn’t step foot on a yacht, personal jet, or unique seashore. Instead, she visited Washington D.C.’s Capitol Hill, the place she and the Environmental Working Group’s President Ken Cook addressed Congress about lengthy past due cosmetics reform.
Although many might argue the significance of make-up towards different forthcoming problems, like gun regulate or international members of the family, the well being dangers posed by way of the counterfeit trade have made it a concern. Just remaining week, government discovered feces in pretend Kylie Cosmetics kits, whilst as an entire, “counterfeit products, which can result chemical and lead poisoning, cost the beauty industry more than $75 million a year.”
Representative Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.), a score member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, says the Food and Drug Administration’s laws for the trade are “obsolete.”
In a subcommittee listening to in January he defined, “They [the guidelines] were enacted in the original Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938. While all other product categories regulated by the agency have been updated to keep pace with innovation and consumer expectations, the laws for cosmetics have been left untouched for nearly 80 years. That is simply unacceptable, and we really should be taking this opportunity to consider legislation to give FDA the authority and the resources to ensure cosmetics are safe for the American people.”
Everyone’s been cheering on Kardashian for the use of her superstar standing to enact alternate, however there appears to be some hypocrisy in her blank attractiveness declarations. According to a tweet (under), Kardashian spoke to Cook about her new eyeshadow collaboration with sister Kylie Jenner for Kylie Cosmetics, announcing the corporate “avoids using toxic chemicals” of their merchandise.
However, as mentioned in any other tweet, Kardashian “Denied to answer what chemicals are in her new makeup line with sister @KylieJenner and side-stepped questions on where the family sources their products…”
In 2016, in keeping with The Cut, Kardashian additionally advised Cricket’s Circle, “I make sure that our products for Kardashian Beauty are made of non-toxic ingredients — our list of banned substances is longer than the list at Whole Foods, which makes me feel really proud.” Once once more, despite the fact that, she didn’t checklist any of the components and simplest claimed the whole thing used to be non-toxic.
Just as a result of one thing isn’t poisonous, doesn’t imply it’s utterly secure. While Kardashian is doing nice paintings and bringing a miles greater target market to the problem to hand, it’s vital she practices what she preaches.