Please click here if you would like to read or save to an HTML file a summary the ideas presented in this blog.

Physics is an observational science whose purpose is not only to explain what we observe but what it is and why we can observe it. For example, for almost 2000 years the geocentric model of the universe was able to successfully predict planetary orbits. Its downfall was caused in part by the observation that the moons of Jupiter did not revolve around the earth and the fact Johannes Kepler was able mathematically define the laws of planetary motion that agreed with observation in terms of them orbiting the sun. However, those laws only define how a planet moves in terms a mathematical point called the center of gravity but does not define what it is.

For example, the observation that we can move on the surface of the earth tells us it has volume bigger than the point which defines its center of gravity.  Putting it another way it requires at least two pieces of information to fully describe a Particle, object, planet or universe. The first is its position which can be defined in terms of a mathematical point in space and the second is information about how it interacts with its environment such as a person walking on it. This tells what is it.

Quantum Mechanics has been very successful at describing the position of particles in terms of a mathematical point.  However, that does NOT mean it defines what they are.

    The fact particles such as an electron can be diffracted supports that conclusion because it is impossible to explain that in terms of a point particle that has no volume. Another observation is that particles are observed to collide in particle accelerators. This could not happen if they no volume.

    However, there are many who feel the mathematics of the Wave function that defines that point also gives us a complete description of what a particle is.  However, if true they MUST be able use a mathematical property of it to explain how that point it defines as a particle can collide with others in particle accelerators or create diffraction patterns.  If they cannot, they MUST repeat MUST accept the DOWNFALL of the idea that the wave function gives a complete definition of a particle and accept the that it can only define its position.

    As was mentioned earlier it requires at least two pieces of information to fully describe a particle, its position and how in interacts with its environment.

    Quantum Mechanics provide one, the position of a particle but as was just shown it cannot not tell what it is or how it interacts with its environment.

However, another core principle of Quantum Mechanics is that a particle’s position can ONLY be define only in terms of probabilities.  This means one can understand what a particle is in terms of its core principle if one can define how  interacts with its environment to create those probabilities.

One way of doing this would be to use the fact the interactions in both quantum and space-time environments are defined or controlled by waves. For example, Relativity defines evolution of space-time in terms of the energy propagated by electromagnetic wave while Quantum Mechanics defines it in terms of the mathematical evolution of the wave function.

    This suggests the wave function that governs the probabilistic evolution of the point defining a particle’s particle position may be a mathematical representation of an electromagnetic wave that governs evolution in space time.  If true one should be able to derive it those probabilities in terms of the interaction of that point with space-time.

    One can accomplish this by using the science of wave mechanics and the observable properties of space-time.

    For example, the science of wave mechanics along with the fact that Relatively tells us wave energy moves continuously through space-time unless it is prevented from doing so by someone or something interacting with it. This would result in its energy being confined to three-dimensional space. The science of wave mechanics also tells us the three-dimensional “walls” of this confinement will result in its energy being reflected back on itself thereby creating a resonant or standing wave in three-dimensional space. This would cause its wave energy to be concentrated at the point in space were a particle would be found. Additionally, wave mechanics also tells us the energy of a resonant system, such as a standing wave can only take on the discrete or quantized values associated with its fundamental or a harmonic of its fundamental frequency.  This defines how and why Quantum Mechanics define energy in terms of quantized units of space time.

    However, it also tells us a particle would occupy an extended volume of space defined by the wavelength of its standing wave. Putting it another way what defines the fact that a particle appears where it does is NOT determined by probabilities associated with the point Quantum Mechanics define as its position but an interaction of an electromagnetic wave with the physical properties of space-time.

    However, IT ALSO tells us the reason particles collide in particle accelerators or create diffraction patterns is because they have and extended volume in terms of mathematical properties of the wave function.

    Not only that, it shows the probabilities Quantum Mechanics associates with the position of a particle is the result of the fact it defines them in terms of a mathematical point in space which would be randomly distributed with respect to a center of the standing wave which earlier defined a one.  Therefore, the randomness of where that point is with respect to a particle’s center will result in its position, when observed to be randomly distributed in space. Pitting it another way one must define where it appears in terms of probabilities to average the deviations that are caused by the random placement of that point.

    The reason why it is not necessary to use probabilities in Relativity is because those deviations are average out by the large number of particles in objects like the moon and planets. 

    As was mentioned earlier it requires at least two pieces of information to fully define a particle, object planet or our universe.  The first is its position the second what it is or how it interacts with its environment.

    As was shown above NEITHER Relativity or Quantum Mechanics CAN do both on their own.  However, we can we can define both the position of a particle and what it is if we combine their core principles to create Theory of Everything.

The post Electron diffraction and the downfall of Quantum Mechanics appeared first on Unifying Quantum and Relativistic Theories.