Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Court Rules That 'Scraping' Public Website Data Isn't Hacking

Scraping public data from a website doesn't constitute "hacking," according to a new Court ruling that could dramatically limit abuse of the United States' primary hacking law. From a report: The ruling comes after a lengthy battle between data analytics firm HiQ Labs and Microsoft owned LinkedIn, which have been at each other's throats for several years over HiQ Labs' practice of scraping the business social networking website's public-facing data, then selling it (fused with other datasets) to a laundry list of employers. In the ruling by The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the court shot down LinkedIn's claim that access to this public data violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). In its declaration, the court ruled that to violate the CFAA, somebody would need to actually "circumvent [a] computer's generally applicable rules regarding access permissions, such as username and password requirements," meaning it's not really hacking if you're not bypassing some kind of meaningful authorization system.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.



This post first appeared on Werbung Austria - Slashdot, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Court Rules That 'Scraping' Public Website Data Isn't Hacking

×

Subscribe to Werbung Austria - Slashdot

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×