Just read this article on Instapoets. There are some good points, like how IG itself was always meant to be a stream of positivity and that is what advertisers really wanted and, all right, that's great, but the analysis of both the vapidity of some instapoets (matched with their success) is compared to all time greats of the past and not with the vapidity of the darlings of the current literary world. IOW there needs to be more of a discussion about both, just as the author here seems to mention the good instapoets without more than a passing glance. Shame. Would like to read much more than this on the subject.