Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Rajasthan Rajya Sahkari Upbhok vs Labour Court Ii Jaipur And Ors on 25 April, 2018

(2) It appears that the Appellant is interested in

flogging a dead horse. Relevant facts are that respondent

No.2 was appointed as a salesman by the appellant and a

charge-sheet was issued to him on 27.11.1984 alleging

that he had misappropriated goods worth `44,954.80 from

the store of which he was the incharge.

(2 of 6) [SAW-435/2006]

(3) At this stage while we were dictating the order

Shri Prateek Kedawat, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr.

R.B.Mathur, Advocate and seeks adjournment which is

declined.

(4) We proceed further.

(5) The Enquiry Officer submitted a report on

5.8.1985. The enquiry Officer recorded the circumstance

under which he was compelled to proceed ex parte against

the respondent, and noted in the report of the Internal

Auditor had recorded that the workman has worked as a

salesman from the year 1979-1980 till the year 1984-1985.

Source: IK



This post first appeared on MMO, Gaming, SEO, Tech, Reviews, News: Gameforumer, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Rajasthan Rajya Sahkari Upbhok vs Labour Court Ii Jaipur And Ors on 25 April, 2018

×

Subscribe to Mmo, Gaming, Seo, Tech, Reviews, News: Gameforumer

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×