(2) It appears that the Appellant is interested in
flogging a dead horse. Relevant facts are that respondent
No.2 was appointed as a salesman by the appellant and a
charge-sheet was issued to him on 27.11.1984 alleging
that he had misappropriated goods worth `44,954.80 from
the store of which he was the incharge.
(2 of 6) [SAW-435/2006]
(3) At this stage while we were dictating the order
Shri Prateek Kedawat, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr.
R.B.Mathur, Advocate and seeks adjournment which is
(4) We proceed further.
(5) The Enquiry Officer submitted a report on
5.8.1985. The enquiry Officer recorded the circumstance
under which he was compelled to proceed ex parte against
the respondent, and noted in the report of the Internal
Auditor had recorded that the workman has worked as a
salesman from the year 1979-1980 till the year 1984-1985.
This post first appeared on MMO, Gaming, SEO, Tech, Reviews, News: Gameforumer, please read the originial post: here