Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Dr. Vijay Kumar Pandya vs Union Of India on 14 December, 2017

This order shall dispose of both these petitions for grant of

anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code”) being MCRC No.25107/2017

and MCRC No.25158/2017 filed on behalf of the petitioners – Dr. Vijay

Kumar Pandya and Dr. Vijay Kumar Ramnani respectively, who apprehend

their arrest in connection with Crime No. RC2172015A0025 (formerly STF

Crime No.12/2013) registered with Police Station – Central Bureau of

Investigation, Bhopal (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 420,

467, 468, 471, 201 read with 120-B of IPC; Section 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of

the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (“PC Act”); Sections 43 read with

66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (“IT Act”); and Sections 3-D

(1) and (2) and 4 of the M.P. Recognised Examination Act, 1937 (“Act of

1937”) as enumerated in the charge-sheet though in the bail applications the

offence mentioned is that under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of

IPC; Sections 65 and 66 of the IT Act; Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the

PC Act and Sections 3-D (1) and (2) and 4 of the Act of 1937.

Source: IK



This post first appeared on MMO, Gaming, SEO, Tech, Reviews, News: Gameforumer, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Dr. Vijay Kumar Pandya vs Union Of India on 14 December, 2017

×

Subscribe to Mmo, Gaming, Seo, Tech, Reviews, News: Gameforumer

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×