CHAPTER 5,THE ART OF Traditional THINKING. PART.2.by mudslinging,could be source of operating Argument. Sentiment or prejudice could form source of an argument and prejudice, can be intricately linked with the ignorance of the discussant.It implie and mere analysis can form the whole bulk of knowledge.We might not be forced to contend that ignorance itself is a stage in knowledge formation.Knowledge logical or illogical can spring from diverse sources,namely the ablution,that include,sentiment,fact, opinion and a host of other source.I classified it as illogical in contrast to fact based or logical.Generally speaking, argument sprouts from different dimensions,flows in counterclockwise direction.Sometimes,its clockwise direction can be punctured by assymetry of standpoint and ensuring safeguard of fact at hand.The mode of argument partly formed by prejudices,might not be punctured by emerging fact, but also by the nature of clarity and logic that supplants the emerging fact.When the clarity is convincing,ample evidence of the presentation distortion automatically warrants the emergence and presentation of the fact at hand, to tarnish the riddles of the haunting prejudice.Although these sources along side sentiments tends to make discussion thick,and undoubtedly,illogical discourse with high ratio of ignorance quashes and decimates the quality of discourse.Hardline knowledge punchers and consumers beyond its facial impression of argumentatives are pissed at its bathos herald