Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Buffalo TeraStation 5210DF

The success of the modern Nas Box can be traced back to the complexities of supporting Windows-based servers 20 years ago.

What IT professionals desperately wanted then were turn-key solutions that didnt require special qualifications to manage, and could be rapidly deployed or repurposed when business requirements changed.

From a certain perspective, it was Microsoft that inspired the NAS revolution when it made Windows Server overly complicated to administer.

Buffalos latest 5010 series TeraStations are the modern descendants of those early NAS solutions. They are sturdy drive enclosures, now endowed with 10GbE network connections and solid state storage.

We recently received the TeraStation 5210DF from Buffalo, in order to discover what makes this equipment special in a highly competitive sector. So here goes


From the outside, there isnt anything truly special about the TeraStation 5210DF. Its a solid plastic and metal ensemble, with two lockable drive bays together with a small LED display on the front, and a collection of predictable ports on the rear.

These include dual Gigabit Ethernet plus a single 10GbE port, allowing for three independent network connections. In addition to the fan exhaust, on the rear are two USB 3.0 ports, primarily for connecting additional external storage.

As with many of these types of devices, its decidedly more interesting on the inside.

Built around a 1.7GHz Annapurna Labs quad-core AL314 ARM processor, 4GB of DDR3 RAM comes pre-installed, along with two enterprise-class 2.5-inch SSDs.

The review model came with two 1TB SSDs installed, making for a total capacity of 2TB if you use them in a RAID 0 (stripe) configuration, or 1TB if you prefer RAID 1 (mirror) for resilience.

There is also a dual 256GB version available, with 512GB of potential space. For whatever reason, Buffalo doesn't sell this kit with 512GB, 2TB or 4TB drive options, even if drives of those capacities are widely available.

You cant buy the 5210DF without drives, but you can install your own later.

Anyone who has operated a NAS box will accept that having the foundation of effective hardware is important, but for this to be fully exploited requires an extensible software platform.

Thats where the 5210DF didnt live up to our expectations.

Web Management GUI

For the typical IT services manager, the 5210DF ticks a few boxes. It is VMware certified, can sync 10,000 user accounts from an Active Directory, runs RSYNC and supports iSCSI volumes.

There is also a degree of cloud support for both Dropbox and Amazon S3. Unfortunately, the S3 support is exclusively for upload and not for synchronizing S3 Cloud storage back to the TeraStation.

Those who use Google or Microsoft for cloud storage get no support at all, amazingly.

Solving that problem is surely just a matter of installing a third-party Linux app? Right? That possible solution assumes that this NAS box supports user-installable apps, and shockingly it doesnt.

It wasnt long after we got the review hardware operational that we realized that Buffalo had taken the 5010 Series hardware down a very particular path. A direction that boldly opposes the current consensus of NAS box design where flexibility is king.

This device isnt about creating a general purpose tool, but rather one that is entirely focused on file serving, almost exclusively. These boundaries became glaringly obvious when we accessed the configuration interface via a web browser.

The Intuitive Web Management GUI, as Buffalo calls it, bears an uncanny resemblance to the web interfaces that weve come to expect from cheap routers, and not a NAS box.

For starters, the interface is determined to use a 1024 x 768 portion of the screen, irrespective of what resolution the browser is running. All sub-menus are modal, so you cant open multiple controls at once.

Where other NAS boxes feel like desktop computers to use, this one certainly doesnt.

The deeper we dug into this limited interface, the less this minimalist strategy made sense.

For example, USB 3.0 ports support EXT3, XFS or FAT32, but not exFAT. While not documented, it will also work with NTFS drives, but only if you pre-format them.

These ports cant be used to connect a printer, plotter or similar device, but UPS (uninterruptible power supplies) can be attached.

Theres no performance tracking, Drupal, WordPress, RADIUS support, and no power management for USB connected storage.

The expression throwing the baby out with the bathwater seems highly appropriate for the excessive pruning that this operating system has undergone.

A few nuggets of functionality that survived include support for Apple Time Machine users, a Failover mode, and NovaBACKUP support. It also masquerades at being a UPnP server, though probably not DLNA compliant, and the manual mentions neither technology.

Theres an argument that as the 5210DFs chief focus is file serving it doesnt need all these user-friendly features that £100 NAS solutions have out of the box. But this line of thinking assumes this is a NAS box that will never be repurposed.


With all its creative eggs in the file serving basket, the fact that this NAS performed well at this particular task wasnt a huge surprise.

If you want 500MB/s plus performance from the 5210DF, then youll need to connect a single client using a 10GbE connection. Channel bonding the Gigabit ports together with an appropriate switch will get you 200MB/s, and a single Gigabit LAN port half that amount.

All those numbers are bandwidth capped values, and not defined by the 5210DF computing platform. Theres enough computing power to drive the LAN ports, with plenty of CPU performance to spare.

The two SSDs that came installed have the potential to work at over 1000MB/s if configured in RAID 0 (stripe) mode, though two bonded 10GbE connections would be required to move that amount of bandwidth outside the box.

The review unit came with two enterprise class Micron 1100 1TB drives (Crucial MTFDDAK1T0TBN) that cost about £320 ($310 in the US) via Amazon.

As the price differential is £720 ($940) between the 512GB model (which retails at £759 thats around $1,000) and the 2TB review unit (priced at £1,479 thats around $1940), buying the smaller one and upgrading it saves you money, and also yields two 256GB SSDs to use elsewhere.

Wed recommend the 1TB drives. Not only for the extra capacity, but also because they are 400TB TBW (Total Bytes Written). Microns 256GB capacity drives are only 120TB TBW rated, making them proportionally less resilient.

For the review model, using the 1TB drives, the TBW rating translates into 91GB being written every day for approximately 12 years.

Final verdict

The inclusion of 10GbE and dual Gigabit links make the 5210DF capable of supporting lots of busy concurrent users, or a smaller number of truly demanding ones.

With dual SSDs installed, speeds in excess of 500MB/s reading and writing are possible to a single client, a performance level normally associated with locally mounted SATA SSDs, and not network attached storage.

It could, in theory, go even faster if there was an affordable mechanism to bond all three LAN ports together, and the client machines all had quick local storage.

But we suspect that Buffalo intended that a single workstation would connect directly over the 10GbE port, including the dual Gigabit ports for wider network distribution.

The firms promotional material mentions server backups and video editing as potential uses, and this NAS can do either of those jobs admirably.

However, 2TB wont go far editing 4K sourced video, and a Thunderbolt connected external SSD drive hooked up to a PC will be quicker than a 10GbE networked NAS box when it comes to backups.

Its also sobering to consider that the Samsung (MZ-V6P2T0BW) 2TB Pro NVMe drive costs about 60% of the price of this product, and a workstation with that installed can expect sequential read speeds in excess of 2,000 MB/s and 1,500MB/s writes.

Buffalo has four, eight and even 12 bay derivatives of this design, which all smash the low 2TB ceiling should you have the pockets deep enough to consider them.

What concerns us about this particular design is that Buffalos single-minded pursuit of raw file serving performance has meant the company has chosen to ignore other important parts of the greater NAS experience.

For around half the cost, Synology has the drive-less DS1817, a machine with dual 10GbE ports, eight drive bays and an OS with 100+ installable applications. Even when you factor in buying enterprise-class SSDs, it isnt any more expensive, and its certainly a substantially more flexible solution.

If this device is only used to secure the contents of another server, then it can do that effectively. But hardware purchased for IT is rarely sourced for such a singular purpose, as business demands quickly evolve.

  • These are the best NAS devices of 2017

This post first appeared on Nastech, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Buffalo TeraStation 5210DF


Subscribe to Nastech

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription