Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Rachel Maddow Defends The Friend Of A Mass Murderer Accepted As A War Criminal In Other Parts Of The World That Are Not The United States Because She's A Woman

Background:





It's Racist Not To Cover & Spread Hillary Clinton's ATROCIOUS Record On Race. African American's Are Being Deceived AGAIN!

War Criminal Henry Kissinger Admires Hillary Clinton's Work In The State Department!?!?!?!


Introduction: Rachel Maddow has actually shown a huge bias towards picking a women candidate as a cultural thing rather than focus on his qualifications. First some past proofs;

Rachel Maddow

  • Maddow Show Did An AWFUL Job Of Answering Hillary's Perplexed Thoughts On Bernie Sanders
  • Steve Kornacki Points Out That Hillary Clinton's Supporters Are Being Hypocritical About Bernie Sanders & His Supporters. If They Were To Look At Their Own Candidates History They Would Find She Did The Same
  • (Sanders Related) Another Example Of Maddow & Steve Using Hillary Clinton's Talking Points As Facts. Should We Not Call "The Maddow Show", "The Hillary Clinton Talking Points Show" Instead?
  • (Trump Related) Rachel Maddow Is Basically Pushing Hillary Clinton's Talking Points As Facts Like Some Sort Of Parrot
  • (Sanders Related) Why "Journalists" Such As Rachel Maddow And Judith Miller Are Totally Useless As Information Sources
  • (Sanders Related) I Smash Rachel Maddow On Using Hillary Clinton's Talking Points As Facts Against Bernie Sanders (Proving These Facts Are Faulty, i.e. Not Showing The Whole Picture)
  • (Sanders Related) I Show How Hillary Clinton's MSNBC Townhall In Philadelphia On April 25th 2016 Was Basically Just Lies
  • (Sanders Related) Super Delegates Have Done Exactly What Samantha Bee Said They Would Do, i.e. Put A 'Brake On A Non-Establishment Candidate'... Why Is That OK? OR Samantha Bee & Rachel Maddow Prove They Don't Understand Super Delegates... Are They Too In Love With Hillary To See The Truth?


First lets see what's going on in Rachel's head;

America a late arrival to choosing female leaders -  Rachel Maddow looks back at some past American female presidential candidacies and notes that while many other countries broke that barrier long ago, Hillary Clinton's nomination will be the closest any American woman has made it so far. Duration: 21:24



Notes;

Bonnet is like the Christian version of the "hijab" to protect what patriarchal cultures value most in a woman i.e. chaste like decency (remember the cleavage episode with Hillary Clinton? That's a similar manifestation of the same idea in our time). In short we are talking about a joke made in a very old time;


At 6:30 you see the female candidate explain that someone called her an "Amazon war monger" on the nuclear issue (i.e. the guy didn't like her position and since she was almost the only female in politics it was like the comic book where this women from the Amazon called "Wonder Woman" came from and in a culture dominated by men did marvels... sounds like a compliment to me).

The expression Rachel has is as if that past time personally offends her. Then she creates a horrible perspective that provides the hypnotic lens through which she shows the next segment of the first white woman candidate for President having a good time while having to share a mic (clearly the whole mic thing was a new thing, that's how old this footage is. Why not go back to Biblical times and comment on women's role in the Abrahamic golden age?).

She plays this example (notice just one podium for questioner and questioner);


There is laughter at the campaign question and miss amazon wonder woman here hits it out of the park;


She may not have won (obviously) but she was good at it and had fun doing it. It was the first time when women still were thought of as "bonnet wearers". I doubt anyone knows what that is anymore.

At 8:26 you can hear the audience stunned reaction to the question on women's issues with appropriate sporadic laughter at the ridiculousness of the question and wonder woman hits it out of the park again. I think by here Rachel was embodying what the Christian poet, Khalil Gibran, meant when he said 'through the lens of the mind even an angel can look like the devil'?

By the end there wonder woman was smiling and laughing and triggering the laughter herself... with applause I might add.

Rachel isn't thinking straight anymore. Rather than seeing our accomplishments as a culture in that now a female politician is a normal thing and no one even thinks of comparing her to some comic book wonder woman (that's how common it is). Now rather than voting (or not voting for as the main bias was back then) for a person based on gender we are evolved enough to vote for a person based on qualifications or lack or them. Hillary has experience but to say she's qualified is to sully what the Constitution meant when it said 'Everyone above a certain age and a natural born citizen can be President', i.e. that's how simple the job is as the Founding Fathers envisioned it. Yes. Women probably were worse off then but it doesn't mean that the culture and Founding Fathers were evil. It was just another time.

At 9:06 we discover what's wrong with Rachel. She's comparing this candidate's gender to the whole gender history as a whole and flipping out over the wrongness of it i.e. she angry at THAT crowd. Like I sometimse flip out over the multiple genocides we love to ignore as a culture (media hides it of course), from the Native Americans to Kissinger's world destabilizing agenda through general, and sometimes focused, genocide. But I'll get to that later.

She points out we had the first "African American" (not one of us, i.e. an American from Africa... as opposed to us regular Americans) candidate back then as well. She point sout that Brazil has a female leader and she is being indicted and the world is not upset about it cause its normal (basically saying 'we are f***** up as a culture and we need to elect a female President to change that now you stupid freaks'. I don't even want to use her tactics of conjecture off phobic responses to past times she she's mirrored on something or another but not the culture as a whole. Such a horrible world to live in! I just fight for ALL people to live rather than focus on a gender or gender of a particular race and nation (more on that in a sec).

At 16:08 She begins with her 'countries we see as peers and countries we look down on because of how they treat their women.

She is so offended by the past she wants a female candidate over anything else. A sort of gender racism... or more accurately a sort of Gender & Race supremacist, which I find fascinating to tell you the truth.

She's basically pushing this strategy;


Larry Wilmore On Electing A Female President: Even Pakistan & Liberia Have Had A Female President Before USA!



You can also see this 'a women - ANY woman - is all we need' attitude in another one of her videos;

What's next for the Sanders movement, post-primary? Nina Turner, former Ohio state senator and surrogate for the Bernie Sanders campaign, talks with Rachel Maddow about Sanders' determination to see his campaign through to the national convention, and to what ends he'll re-purpose his political support after the primary.



Here is the reality of her Candidate that Rachel likes to ignore for various reasons, none of them journalistic (i.e. her prime days as a Journalist are now over, she's just a hack now);

White nationalists encouraged by Trump's message Rachel Maddow shares some of an interview between MSNBC's Jacob Soboroff and white nationalist and, briefly, former Donald Trump delegate William Johnson about why Trump's message resonates with white nationalism.



The reason it's a smear is because Henry Kissinger was the right hand man of a known racist (Nixon) and his foreign policy is standard KKK policy (if you look at our "Native American" past).

Here is how Henry Kissinger describes his foreign policy (which has been adopted by the State Department with Hillary being so good at it that she was actually complimented by him!)

In debate, Hillary Clinton boasted that she is supported by Henry Kissinger, accused war criminal who oversaw policies that led to millions of deaths Hillary Clinton has a long history of supporting former Secretary of State Henry Kissenger

Kissinger also promoted a “madman” strategy in the U.S. war in Vietnam, in which approximately 3 million Vietnamese were killed. Kissinger’s strategy was to make the U.S.’s enemies believe it “might be crazy” enough to drop a nuclear bomb on them.
In “The Trial of Henry Kissinger,” Christopher Hitchens accused Kissinger of the following crimes, recommending that they be tried in international court:
1. The deliberate mass killing of civilian populations in Indochina.
2. Deliberate collusion in mass murder, and later in assassination, in Bangladesh.
3. The personal suborning and planning of murder, of a senior constitutional officer in a democratic nation — Chile — with which the United States was not at war.
4. Personal involvement in a plan to murder the head of state in the democratic nation of Cyprus.
5. The incitement and enabling of genocide in East Timor
6. Personal involvement in a plan to kidnap and murder a journalist living in Washington, D.C.
Kissinger has returned the admiration to former Secretary Clinton. In 2012, he sent Clinton an intimate handwritten message, stating “I greatly admire the skill and aplomb with which you conduct our foreign policy.”

You can see that what Kissinger sees as sensible foreign policy is exactly what we did with the Native Americans in our White Supremacist past and since Nixon liked white supremacist leaders and Kissinger was his right hand man and is a close friend of the Clintons, what we have here is a clear connection to white supremacists that only hack journalists can ignore.

Here is another example of a positive bias towards her candidate because of her gender (thus having a negative bias towards anyone of the other gender... my point is Maddow is too biased to provide us with useful or at least accurate information anymore);

Diagnosis? 

Rachel has a form of Gender based racism that seems to follow what we have learned from recent scientific studies;


Alternet: 11 Ways White America Avoids Taking Responsibility for its RacismThe pernicious impact of "white fragility."

Alternet: Why White People Freak Out When They're Called Out About Race'White fragility' is a defensive response to real conversations about race.

Is everybody a racist?The studies just keep coming. Unconscious racism is pervasive. It starts early. And it creates a deadly empathy gap

How can we fix unconscious racism?Racial prejudice has its roots in children’s natural drive to carve the world up into categories. Can research do anything to fix this?


More?


I SMASH Corporate Media!!!

  • I Prove, With An Ethnic Spanish Professor, That The Media IS Misconstruing Trump's Words On Mexicans Showing Thier Unconscious Racism.... Using Lawrence O Donnell, Rachel Maddow, Nightly Show & Articles
  • Daily Show: A Compilation Of Jon Stewart On Fox News
  • Daily Show: Jon Stewart On MSNBC (A Compilation)
  • Daily Show: A Compilation Of Jon Stewart on CNN
  • I Prove That Lawrence O Donnell Is Too Biased & Weird To Be Trusted With News Of Any Sort (Elizabeth Warren Helps Prove This One)
  • (Dem Primary) Super Delegates Have Done Exactly What Samantha Bee Said They Would Do, i.e. Put A 'Brake On A Non-Establishment Candidate'... Why Is That OK? OR Samantha Bee & Rachel Maddow Prove They Don't Understand Super Delegates... Are They Too In Love With Hillary To See The Truth?
  • Chris Hayes & The Rest Of The Liberal Media Push A Con Artists Party's View About Trump i.e. That Marco Rubio & The GOP Aren't The Con Artists It's Trump! (Memory Loss?)
  • The Ultimate Collection Of 50 Fox News Lies Exposed By The Daily Show & Backed By Politifact
  • I Smash Lawrence O'Donnell On His Utter Hypocrisy Or Stupidity. Only A Lie Detector Could Determine Which.
  • Steve Kornacki Points Out That Hillary Clinton's Supporters Are Being Hypocritical About Bernie Sanders & His Supporters. If They Were To Look At Their Own Candidates History They Would Find She Did The Same
  • Clear Proof That MSNBC Didn't Cover The Iraq War As A Media Should (Same Goes for CNN & Fox News)
  • Beltway Media Covers Up Reporting On A Bi-Partisan Senate Report Proving We Were Misled Into The Iraq War By The Bush Administration & Jon Stewart Makes Fun Of The Media's Coverup
  • Rachel Maddow On The Iraq War Lies Ignored In Republican Campaign Coverage By The Beltway Media
  • The "Beltway Media" Is Covering Up The The Truth About The Iraq War Again & This Time There Is No Escaping That Fact
  • Jon Stewart Slams The Media for Continuing To Not Report Properly on The Iraq War... AGAIN!
  • Jon Stewart Smashes CNN, MSNBC, & Fox News For Their Hypocrisy In Misleading The Public Over The Iraq War & Not Admitting It
  • As The Media Laments The Upcoming Loss Of Jon Stewart From The Daily Show, They Avoid Mentioning The Episode Of The Day Before
  • Phil Donahue on His 2003 Firing from MSNBC, When Liberal Network Couldn’t Tolerate Antiwar Voices



This post first appeared on Culture & Society, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Rachel Maddow Defends The Friend Of A Mass Murderer Accepted As A War Criminal In Other Parts Of The World That Are Not The United States Because She's A Woman

×

Subscribe to Culture & Society

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×