Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Battle of Navarino

Battle Of Navarino


The Battle of Navarino, occurring on October 20, 1827, in the waters of the Ionian Sea, was a pivotal moment in the Greek War of Independence against the Ottoman Empire. It marked the last major naval battle fought entirely with sailing ships and the final large-scale conflict of the age of sail. The battle involved an alliance of British, French, and Russian naval forces against the Ottoman fleet, and its outcome had far-reaching consequences for the region. The decisive victory of the Allied fleet not only secured Greek independence but also significantly weakened Ottoman power in the Eastern Mediterranean. The Battle of Navarino is remembered as a turning point in the history of naval warfare and a symbol of the struggle for freedom and independence.


  • Greek War of Independence: As a component of the broader Greek War of Independence (1821-1832), the Battle of Navarino was a crucial moment in the Greek revolution against the Ottoman Empire’s centuries-long rule over Greece.
  • International Involvement: The war attracted international attention, with many European powers sympathetic to the Greek cause. Russia, France, and Britain supported Greece, albeit for different reasons, leading to tensions and rivalries among the allies.
  • Ottoman Response: The Ottoman Empire, facing internal rebellions and external pressures, sent a large fleet to quell the Greek uprising and assert its control over the region.
  • Allied Strategy: The Allied forces, aware of the Ottoman naval threat, sought to neutralize the Ottoman fleet to secure Greek independence and protect their interests in the region.
  • Diplomatic Efforts: Despite the looming conflict, diplomatic efforts failed to prevent a direct confrontation, ultimately leading to the Battle of Navarino.
  • Naval Arms Race: The battle occurred during a transition in naval warfare, with the traditional sailing ships being gradually replaced by steam-powered vessels, adding a technological dimension to the conflict.
  • Geopolitical Ramifications: The battle’s outcome not only secured Greek independence but also reshaped the power dynamics in the Eastern Mediterranean, weakening the Ottoman Empire and influencing European diplomacy.

The Opposing Forces

The Battle of Navarino involved two main opposing forces:

1. Allied Fleet

  • British Royal Navy: The British contributed a significant portion of the Allied fleet, showcasing their naval power in the Mediterranean. Their fleet included powerful ships of the line and experienced naval officers.
  • French Navy: France sent a contingent of warships to support the Greek cause and challenge Ottoman dominance in the region. French naval vessels played a crucial role in the battle.
  • Imperial Russian Navy: Russia contributed ships to the Allied fleet to weaken the Ottoman Empire and expand Russian influence in the Eastern Mediterranean. Russian vessels were instrumental in the battle’s outcome.

2. Ottoman Fleet

  • Ottoman Navy: The Ottoman Empire deployed a sizable fleet to suppress the Greek rebellion and maintain control over its territories in the Eastern Mediterranean. The Ottoman fleet consisted of various types of warships, including ships-of-the-line, frigates, and smaller vessels.
  • Egyptian Navy: Egypt, a semi-autonomous province of the Ottoman Empire under Muhammad Ali Pasha, also contributed naval forces to the Ottoman fleet. Egyptian ships played a significant role in the battle.
  • Algerian Navy: The Ottoman fleet also included ships from its regency of Algeria, which provided additional firepower and manpower.

Planning and Preparation

The planning and preparation leading up to the Battle of Navarino involved strategic, diplomatic, and logistical considerations on the part of both the Allied and Ottoman forces:

  • Allied Coordination: The British, French, and Russian navies coordinated their efforts to support the Greek War of Independence against Ottoman rule. Diplomatic negotiations among the allied powers aimed to align their strategic objectives and coordinate military actions.
  • Naval Strategy: The Allied powers devised a strategy to neutralize the Ottoman naval threat and support the Greek rebels. This strategy involved establishing a naval blockade to prevent Ottoman reinforcements from reaching Greece and to put pressure on the Ottoman fleet.
  • Fleet Deployment: The Allied navies assembled a formidable fleet of ships, including ships-of-the-line, frigates, and support vessels. Deploying this fleet to the Eastern Mediterranean required careful planning and coordination to ensure logistical support and maintain operational readiness.
  • Intelligence Gathering: Both sides engaged in intelligence gathering to assess the strength and disposition of their opponent’s forces. This involved reconnaissance missions, surveillance of enemy movements, and gathering information from local sources.
  • Logistical Support: The allied fleet required logistical support to sustain operations in the Mediterranean. This included securing supply lines, establishing naval bases and harbors, and ensuring adequate provisions for sailors and troops.
  • Diplomatic Efforts: Diplomats engaged in negotiations with the Ottoman Empire in a bid to peacefully resolve the conflict. However, these efforts ultimately failed, leading to the escalation of hostilities and the eventual confrontation at Navarino.

Key Players

The Battle of Navarino featured several pivotal figures whose actions were instrumental in determining the conflict’s outcome:

  • Admiral Edward Codrington (British): Commanded the Allied fleet during the battle. His strategic leadership and decision-making were instrumental in securing victory for the Allies.
  • Captain Thomas Fellowes (British): He led HMS Dartmouth, one of the British ships that took part in the battle. His actions during the engagement were notable for their effectiveness.
  • Vice Admiral Henri de Rigny (French): Commanded the French contingent of the allied fleet. His coordination with other allied commanders was vital to the success of the operation.
  • Rear Admiral Lodewijk van Heiden (Russian): Commanded the Russian squadron in the allied fleet. His tactical skills and experience were crucial in the battle.
  • Ibrahim Pasha (Egyptian): Commander of the Egyptian fleet allied with the Ottomans. His decisions and actions during the battle influenced its outcome.
  • Mahmud Dramali Pasha (Ottoman): The commander of the Ottoman fleet had his strategies and leadership abilities tested during the battle.

Naval Tactics

The Battle of Navarino saw a clash of naval tactics, with the Allied and Ottoman fleets employing different strategies:

1. Allied Tactics

  • Line of Battle: The allied fleet formed a line of battle, a traditional naval tactic where ships sail side by side in a line, allowing them to concentrate their firepower on the enemy.
  • Crossing the T: The allied ships aimed to “cross the T” of the Ottoman fleet, positioning themselves perpendicular to the enemy’s line to maximize their firepower and minimize their exposure to return fire.
  • Use of Steam Power: Some allied ships, equipped with steam engines, were able to maneuver more effectively, giving them an advantage over the Ottoman sailing ships.

2. Ottoman Tactics

  • Defensive Formation: The Ottoman fleet adopted a defensive crescent-shaped formation, with the larger ships forming the front line and smaller vessels protecting the flanks.
  • Broadside Attacks: Ottoman ships relied on traditional broadside attacks, where they fired their cannons from the sides of the ship, aiming to inflict damage on the Allied fleet.
  • Limited Maneuverability: The Ottoman fleet’s lack of steam-powered ships and less experienced crews limited their ability to maneuver effectively during the battle.

Course of the Battle

The Battle of Navarino unfolded in several stages, each crucial to the eventual outcome:

  • Initial Maneuvers: The allied fleet entered the Bay of Navarino on October 20, 1827, and began positioning itself for battle. The Ottomans, taken by surprise, scrambled to organize their fleet.
  • Opening Salvoes: The battle began with exchanges of gunfire between the two fleets. The allied ships focused on breaking through the Ottoman line while the Ottomans attempted to maintain their formation.
  • Crossing the T: The Allied fleet successfully executed a maneuver to cross the Ottoman line, allowing them to concentrate their fire on the Ottoman ships with devastating effect.
  • Fierce Combat: The battle devolved into close-quarters combat, with ships exchanging broadsides and engaging in boarding actions on both sides. The superior gunnery and discipline of the Allied forces began to take their toll on the Ottoman fleet.
  • Ottoman Counterattacks: Despite heavy losses, some Ottoman ships managed to launch counterattacks, but they could not turn the tide of the battle.
  • Final Phase: As the battle raged, the Allied fleet gained the upper hand, and many Ottoman ships were sunk or disabled.
  • Surrender and Aftermath: Realizing the futility of further resistance, the Ottoman fleet surrendered. The Battle of Navarino resulted in a decisive victory for the Allied forces, effectively ending Ottoman naval dominance in the Eastern Mediterranean and contributing to Greece’s eventual independence.


The aftermath of the Battle of Navarino had significant repercussions both regionally and internationally:

  • Greek Independence: The decisive victory of the allied fleet at Navarino dealt a severe blow to Ottoman control over Greece. The battle hastened the end of the Greek War of Independence, leading to the establishment of an independent Greek state.
  • Diplomatic Fallout: The battle caused diplomatic tensions between the Allied powers and the Ottoman Empire. Although the allies claimed they were acting in self-defense, the Ottoman Empire protested vehemently, leading to strained relations.
  • International Impact: The Battle of Navarino had broader implications for European diplomacy. It highlighted the growing influence of the Great Powers (Britain, France, and Russia) in the Eastern Mediterranean and contributed to the decline of Ottoman power in the region.
  • End of the Age of Sail: Navarino marked one of the last major naval battles fought entirely with sailing ships. The battle demonstrated the effectiveness of steam-powered vessels and signaled the beginning of the end of the age of sail.
  • Legacy for Naval Warfare: The battle’s tactics and strategies influenced subsequent developments in naval warfare. It showcased the importance of coordinated fleet actions and the use of superior technology in achieving victory at sea.
  • Impact on Ottoman Empire: The loss of a significant portion of its navy weakened the Ottoman Empire’s ability to project power in the Mediterranean. It also emboldened nationalist movements within the empire’s other territories.
  • Humanitarian Consequences: The battle resulted in significant loss of life and destruction of ships on both sides. The humanitarian consequences, including casualties among sailors and civilians, underscored the brutality of warfare in the 19th century.

Casualties and Human Cost

The Battle of Navarino resulted in significant casualties and a high human cost for both sides:

  • Allied Forces: The Allied fleet suffered around 600 casualties, including killed, wounded, and missing. The British, French, and Russian navies all incurred losses, with several ships damaged or destroyed.
  • Ottoman Forces: The Ottoman fleet suffered much more significant losses, with estimates of casualties ranging from 3,000 to 6,000. Many Ottoman ships were sunk or disabled during the battle.
  • Civilian Casualties: The battle also had a civilian toll, as it took place near the town of Navarino (modern-day Pylos), where some inhabitants were caught in the crossfire or affected by the destruction.
  • Humanitarian Impact: The battle highlighted the human cost of war, with many sailors and civilians losing their lives or suffering injuries. The scale of the casualties underscored the brutality of naval warfare in the 19th century.
  • Long-Term Consequences: The loss of life and destruction caused by the Battle of Navarino had long-term consequences for the region. It contributed to the destabilization of the Ottoman Empire and the eventual independence of Greece, but it also left a legacy of suffering and loss for those affected by the conflict.

Commemoration and Remembrance

The Battle of Navarino is commemorated and remembered in various ways, reflecting its significance in Greek history and the broader context of European diplomacy and naval warfare. Some of the key aspects of commemoration and remembrance include:

  • National Holidays: October 20th is observed as a national holiday in Greece, marking the anniversary of the Battle of Navarino. It is a day to remember and honor those who fought for Greek independence and to celebrate the country’s liberation from Ottoman rule.
  • Monuments and Memorials: Both Greece and other countries have dedicated several monuments and memorials to commemorate the Battle of Navarino. These include statues, plaques, and commemorative markers that pay tribute to the participants and the battle’s significance.
  • Cultural Representations: Various forms of art, literature, and music have depicted the Battle of Navarino. Paintings, poems, novels, and operas have immortalized the battle and its heroes, contributing to its enduring legacy in popular culture.
  • Educational Programs: Schools and educational institutions in Greece often incorporate the Battle of Navarino into their curriculum. Students learn about the battle’s historical context, significance, and impact on Greek history and independence.
  • Military and Naval Tradition: The Battle of Navarino is remembered in military and naval traditions, serving as a reminder of the courage and sacrifice of those who fought in the conflict. Naval warfare experts often cite it as an example of strategic and tactical prowess.
  • International Relations: The diplomatic implications of the Battle of Navarino are also remembered in the context of international relations. Observers cite the battle as an example of how political, military, and diplomatic factors intricately shape historical outcomes.


The Battle of Navarino was a decisive naval engagement that ended in a resounding victory for the Allied forces, comprising the British, French, and Russian navies, against the Ottoman-Egyptian fleet. Fought on October 20, 1827, in the Bay of Navarino, the battle resulted in the destruction or capture of a significant portion of the Ottoman fleet. The battle’s outcome played a crucial role in the Greek War of Independence, eventually establishing an independent Greek state. Navarino also marked a turning point in naval warfare, demonstrating the effectiveness of steam-powered ships and influencing future naval strategies and technologies.

The post Battle of Navarino appeared first on EDUCBA.

This post first appeared on Free Online CFA Calculator Training Course | EduCB, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Battle of Navarino