Why did I reduce 58.5 to 29.25 for 30 years, before cubing for 100 years?
Probably because I wanted increase per individual, but if so I should have multiplied with six instead of three.
Either way, if we don't look at typical demographics which are downtoned by marriages becoming economically impossible or people becoming too insignificnat to marry or so, but at physical theoretical limits, we could have had quite a lot of people between Flood and Babel even if it was around 101 after Flood.
In fact even traditional estimates like
* My translation is this link, but above links to where quoted in apt portion.