Background: A copy of my e-mailed to Daniel C. Peterson, Ph.D. regarding some questions I had about Dr. Daniel Pipes. Also, Dr. Petersons response is copied below. Dr. Peterson approved the posting of his response to my e-mail.
Brother Peterson:
First, I want to personally thank you for all your efforts at FAIR. I think your posts would make an excellent book for all aspiring apologist. Again, ThankYouVeryMuch!
Because of your expertise in Islam and the
I ask this because some LDS believe the following about Dr. Pipes: Daniel Pipes is a demagogue with absolutely no interest in scholarly debate writes rubbish His failure to acknowledge the diversity of the debate please choose someone that bothers to read what they write
And because I know what its like to have my faith misrepresented, I do not wish to give credence to Dr. Pipess work if he is in fact the Muslim Expert equivalent of Decker/Tanner et al.
If, in your opinion, Dr. Pipess ought not to be taken seriously, then Id certainly stop citing him as an expert. I sure would like to know whom you would recommend I can put my trust in as it relates to Islam, the Arab-Israel conflict, terrorism, etc.
Thread at Millennial Star where I am discussion concerning the Danish cartoons.
http://www.millennialstar.org/index.php/2006/02/07/the_limits_of_free_speech_free_speech#comments
Daniel Pipes
Director
Bio: http://www.danielpipes.org/bios/
Areas of Expertise: Militant Islam, Arab-Israel conflict,
Contact: [email protected]
http://www.meforum.org/experts.php
http://www.danielpipes.org/bios/
http://www.danielpipes.org/bio.pdf
http://www.meforum.org/
LDS Patriot
www.ldspatriot.com
---
Dr. Petersons response to my e-mail above:
I think highly of him. His father, Richard Pipes, was a famous Sovietologist at Harvard whose writing I admired. He himself earned a Ph.D. At Harvard with a dissertation on the Mamluks of medieval
I confess that I have a bias with regard to Dr. Pipes, since hes had some nice things to say about me (on the basis, in my view, of insufficient evidence). But, even factoring that in, I think his is a voice that should not be shunned.
I have at least one colleague here at BYU who despises him, too, but then, that colleague and I disagree very, very much on politics, as well.
Ive never found Daniel Pipes to be a demagogue.
He is certainly not an Ed Decker or a Jerald/Sandra Tanner.
Keep reading Daniel Pipes. Another good writerperhaps the greatest scholar of Islam writing in Englishis Bernard Lewis, an Englishman now long retired from
Lewis also catches flak from some of my Islamicist colleagues, at least for his recent and more overtly political writing. But thats to a large extent because most of my colleagues lean politically left, as do most academics generally. (I do not.) It doesnt hurt to read some of the more liberal Islamicists too (such as John Esposito), to get various perspectives, but I am not very pleased with the campaign to blacken and marginalize Daniel Pipes. If hes wrong, that should be demonstrated with evidence and analysis, not by name-calling.
Best wishes to you.
Sincerely,
Dan Peterson
--
Daniel C. Peterson, Ph.D.
Professor of Islamic Studies and Arabic
Editor-in-Chief, Middle Eastern Texts Initiative
3087