Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

A Quick Refutation Of King James/Textus Receptus Onlyism

  • Question:
           -If the Textus Receptus is inerrant, then why is it missing the last six verses of the Book of Revelation, which are included in the King James Version? Why would Erasmus need to back translate them from Latin into Greek so that he could translate them into English (even producing variants with no manuscript support)? Why does the King James Version contain a translation error in Revelation 22:19 ("book of life")?


This post first appeared on Rational Christian Discernment, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

A Quick Refutation Of King James/Textus Receptus Onlyism

×

Subscribe to Rational Christian Discernment

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×