A major new study out of Harvard University has
revealed the true extent of the mainstream media’s
bias against Donald Trump.
They found that the tone of some outlets was
negative in as many as 98% of reports, significantly
more hostile than the first 100 days of the three
previous administrations:
The academics based their study on seven US outlets and three European ones.
In America they analyzed CNN, NBC, CBS, Fox News,
the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall
Street Journal.
They also took into account the BBC, the UK’s
Financial Times and the German public broadcaster
ARD.
Every outlet was negative more often than positive.
Only Fox News, which features some of Trump’s most
enthusiastic supporters and is often given special
access to the President, even came close to positivity.
MORE
- German Police Could Have Stopped Berlin Terror Attack, ‘Covered Up’ Failure to Do So
- BREAKING NEWS: Assange Rape Investigation Dropped by Sweden
- Judge Dredd At 40: 2000AD’s Remarkably Edgy Origins Story
Fox was ranked 52% negative and 48% positive.
The study also divided news items across topics. On
immigration, healthcare, and Russia, more than 85%
of reports were negative.
On the economy, the proportion was more balanced –
54% negative to 46% positive:
The study highlighted one exception: Trump got
overwhelmingly positive coverage for launching a
cruise missile attack on Syria.
Around 80% of all reports were positive about that.
The picture was very different for other recent
administrations. The study found that President
Obama’s first 100 days got a good write-up overall –
with 59% of reports positive.
Bill Clinton and George W Bush got overall negative
coverage, it found, but to a much lesser extent than
Trump. Clinton’s first 100 days got 40% positivity, while
Bush’s got 43%:
Trump has repeatedly claimed that his treatment by the
media is unprecedented in its hostility.
This study suggests that, at least when it comes to
recent history, he’s right.
