WASHINGTON, D.C. — I’m sitting in the passenger seat of a modified Audi A7 going about 50 mph on a Washington freeway when the driver — an Audi engineer — takes his hands off the wheel. A strip of sky-blue LEDs just beneath the windshield lights up, the dashboard behind the steering wheel indicates the car is in “piloted” mode, and the steering wheel recedes slightly.

Now, and for the next five minutes or so, the car’s doing the Driving.

As we pass an interchange, a sedan and an SUV move to merge into our lane. The Audi, nicknamed “Jack,” slows down on its own, giving the other cars enough room to merge safely. All the while the Audi engineer, Kaushik, doesn’t lift a finger — or a toe for that matter — to touch the wheel or the pedals.

A few minutes of automated cruising later, and our freeway exit is getting close. A warning chime begins to ring and a voice advises the driver to take over steering. Those calming blue LEDs are now blinking red. The car’s still doing the driving, but clearly it wants a human to take control. Kaushik still doesn’t touch the wheel — that’s because he’s going out of his way to show how hard the car’s automation system will work to get the attention of the driver.

Racing toward driverless

This is Audi’s vision of the future of automated driving, and it’s not too far away. The Volkswagen-owned brand plans to sell a version of this technology as soon as 2018. That system, destined to be an option in an upcoming Audi A8, is intended for stop-and-go freeway traffic jams — arguably the most frustrating part of the commuting experience — but it’ll only work at speeds less than 35 mph.

In Audi’s case, the car has many different pairs of eyes, so the driver’s can potentially wander.

The system I experienced takes the automation up a notch: Not only will it be able to take the wheel on jammed-up freeways, but clear ones as well, and at up to 70 mph. That system, which Audi expects to have in production cars by 2021, can drive the car up to the posted speed limit on freeways for extended periods — speeding up, slowing down and even automatically changing lanes as needed.

That may sound similar to other systems out there, notably Tesla’s Autopilot, but Audi’s autonomous tech is demonstrably more capable. Feature-wise, the two systems are very similar (though Tesla’s needs the driver to indicate a lane change), but there are some very notable technical differences: Audi’s Jack uses more sensor systems, including radar below the headlights, a camera mounted behind the rear-view mirror, and LIDAR (light detection and ranging), which is a sophisticated laser-based radar that helps a self-driving car “see” what’s in front of it, and is notably absent on Autopilot. Jack has ultrasonic sensors as well.

That all adds up to a big chunk of redundancy — a critical part of Audi’s approach. If some of the sensors fail to see an obstacle, there are several others that probably will. With Tesla Autopilot, the driver is essentially the backup system; they must pay attention and step in should the situation require it. In Audi’s case, the car has many different pairs of eyes, so the driver’s can potentially wander.

That underscores biggest difference between the two systems, which is one of experience, even philosophy. When the automated system is active and the car is doing the driving, Audi fully expects the person in the driver’s seat to disengage — at least somewhat — from the driving experience. While other systems (like Autopilot) tell the driver they need to keep their hands on the wheel, Audi’s actively discourages it: If you grab the wheel, the system turns off.

So what if, say, those idle hands start to do a little texting?

The driver that’s not a driver

From Audi’s perspective, that’s actually OK, for several reasons. First, the driver wouldn’t be able to activate piloting at all before the computer approves every item on a predetermined checklist, which looks at several factors, including road conditions, weather conditions and the exact location of the car (if it’s not on a freeway or highway, no dice).

Second is Driver Availability Detection — another feature not found in Autopilot or other current semi-autonomous systems. In addition to road-scanning tech, the Audi is equipped with several internal sensors, continuously checking if the driver is present, awake and “available to intervene.” It’s unclear what level of awareness it’s looking for, or if the car would nudge you if you were to, say, watch a movie or play a video game. What’s even less clear is if it should.

Certainly, the Tesla Autopilot crash has prompted a broader rethink about semi-autonomous vehicles. It seems apparent that the Tesla driver who was killed was completely disengaged from driving (he was reportedly watching a “Harry Potter” movie), even though Tesla (not to mention common sense) says you should keep your hands on the wheel and stay alert and aware.

Now here comes Audi, with a car that encourages just the opposite. Audi is confident its piloting system is ready for anything, at least on the freeway, and it may be right. Audi’s reps wouldn’t speak directly about the Tesla Crash, but they did point out that Jack’s multiple sensor systems — particularly LIDAR — give its piloting system an edge that no other production car on the road today has. And even if the driver doesn’t respond to commands to resume driving, the car will pull over and stop on its own.

While that’s probably enough for early adopters to put their trust in Audi’s self-driving tech, others will be more wary, especially given the scrutiny on Tesla’s (admittedly less sophisticated) system. That’s why Audi is keeping the technology strictly as an option. It’s also designing the tech so the cars still look and feel like cars and not futuristic driving pods, à la Google.

Can the self-driving future survive the semi-autonomous present?

Like other carmakers, Audi is eagerly awaiting guidelines on autonomous vehicles from the government, but the wait is almost over. The Department of Transportation is due to issue best practices this summer, though they may not be as pro-autonomy as many enthusiasts hope; it would be hard to believe the recent Tesla crash isn’t factoring highly in regulators’ thinking. Not to mention the whether the millions of miles that Autopilot and other systems have logged have really been as safe as Elon Musk and others like to think.

The challenge now for Audi — and every carmaker developing autonomous technology — is to convince lawmakers and the buying public that dangerous errors like the Tesla crash are outliers, that the dream of truly driverless cars requires this interstitial (and uncertain) step of semi-autonomy, and that they can be trusted to ensure those systems are safe.

It feels like a tall order. That is, until you go for a ride in one of these robot cars and watch it take the wheel. Then you start to think anything is possible.

Have something to add to this story? Share it in the comments.