Peter Weisberg, The Climate Trust
Weekly Policy and Finance Update – January 29, 2018
THE BOTTOM LINE.
| California is changing the landscape for digester development; funding the Pilot Financial Mechanism and allowing projects to be credited for their full methane benefit, even if they make both fuel and electricity, is essential. |
On the heels of California’s Governor Brown releasing a proposal to commit $99M additional grant dollars to dairy methane reductions in the state, I wanted to review two key recommendations The Trust has been making as part of the Fostering Markets for Digester Projects group in California. The group’s recommendations are meant to ensure that environmental markets can effectively leverage private capital to help meet California’s stringent methane reduction requirements.
First, California must fund and implement the Pilot Financial Mechanism to mitigate uncertainty in environmental credit values. Significant uncertainty about the longevity and pricing in the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) and federal Renewable Fuel Standard RIN market heavily discounts the ability of these markets to enable the financing of dairy biogas to transportation fuel projects. As a starting point, the state needs to invest at least $25M into the Pilot Financial Mechanism to provide long-term price assurance for LCFS credits. Only by allocating actual dollars to implement the mechanism, can risk be mitigated and new projects be built.
Second, the cap and trade legislation must be updated so that biogas projects generating both electricity and fuel can be recognized for their full methane reduction. Current guidance from the Air Resources Board proposes that projects cannot generate both LCFS credits and California Carbon Offsets from Registry Offset Credits generated by the same reporting period. In practice, this means projects cannot receive credits for their entire methane benefit. The cap and trade regulation should be updated to explicitly allow projects generating both electricity and fuel to be credited for the entire methane reduction they generate.
California is changing the landscape for digester development, and has an incredible opportunity to demonstrate that public funding can be spent prudently and efficiently through both credit enhancements, such as the Pilot Financial Mechanism, and pay-for-performance mechanisms, like the offset and LCFS market. By doing so, the state will ensure that these programs incentivize effective and well-managed projects that reduce methane over the long-term.
Research and Resources
| Dairy and Livestock Subgroup #2: Fostering Markets for Digester Projects California Air Resources Board |
Top News Headlines
| Governor Brown Takes Action to Increase Zero-Emission Vehicles, Fund New Ciimate investments Office of Governor Brown, January 26, 2018Oregon’s Clean Energy Jobs Bill is Poised for a Breakthrough Kristin Eberhard, Sightline Institute, January 22, 2018 |
Nothing But Clear Skies Blog
A New Phase of Development for California Dairy Digesters
Peter Weisberg, The Climate Trust, October 30, 2017
Recent Scorcher
Learnings from the Credit Suisse Conservation Finance Conference Sean Penrith, Jan 22, 2018
Oregon Should Look to Offset Quality, Not Offset Usage Limits Sheldon Zakreski, Jan 15, 2018
CA Should Explore Options to Increase Offset Usage Peter Weisberg, Jan 8, 2018
Image credit: Flickr/Mark Jensen
This post first appeared on The Climate Trust | Invest With Purpose, please read the originial post: here
