Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Why Clarence Thomas’s Rulings on Race Are so Idiosyncratic

On Monday, the Supreme Court held that two gerrymanders passed by the North Carolina legislature were unconstitutional. All eight justices to hear the case—which was heard before Justice Neil Gorsuch joined the Court—agreed that one of the majority-minority districts in question, District 1, was a gerrymander based on Race and hence unconstitutional under the Fourteenth… Read More »

The post Why Clarence Thomas’s Rulings on Race Are so Idiosyncratic appeared first on Black Politics on the Web.



This post first appeared on BlackPoliticsontheWeb.com, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Why Clarence Thomas’s Rulings on Race Are so Idiosyncratic

×

Subscribe to Blackpoliticsontheweb.com

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×