Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Top-Two Systems in CA and WA in 2016 Bar All Minor Party Candidates from November Ballot with One Process Exception


Thanks to Richard Winger of Ballot Access News for this post.

The Top-two systems used in California and Washington have again barred all Minor Party candidates from the November ballot, except the Minor Party candidates who ran in races with only one Major Party candidate on the ballot.

In California, excluding the Presidential Primary, there were fourteen Minor Party candidates on a Primary ballot: nine Libertarians, two Greens, two Peace & Freedom members, and one member of the American Independent Party.

None of those were in races with only one or two candidates on the Primary ballot, and none of them qualified for the November ballot.

However, there were four California Libertarians running for the Assembly who will advance to the November ballot, because in all four races only one name was printed in the Primary ballot.

The four Libertarians will be on the November ballot in the 1st, 2nd, 51st, and 62nd Districts. None of the four Libertarians’ names were on the Primary ballot. In all four instances they were write-in candidates.

In Washington, there were thirty-three Minor Party candidates on a Primary ballot for Federal or State office: 29 Libertarians, one Green, one Socialist Workers, one Fifth Republic Party, and one Citizens Party. Of these thirty-three candidates, eleven ran in races with only two names on the Primary ballot, so of course all eleven of them qualified for the November ballot. All eleven of these are Libertarians. The Washington Libertarian Party did an excellent job of predicting which races would only have one other name on the Primary ballot, and then recruiting a candidate for such races. One of those races is the Attorney General’s race, where the only other candidate who filed is a Democrat.

Washington does not draw a clear line between independent candidates and Minor Party candidates, because there is no Party registration, and any candidate can have any short label on the ballot that is not obscene. It would be possible for an argument to be made that his tally of 33 Minor Party candidates is too low. To differentiate between Minor Party candidates and independent candidates with a political label, He talked to some of the candidates, or looked at their web pages, or their statements in the Voters Guide, to try to differentiate actual Minor Parties from independents with a label. But even if his classification is wrong, the conclusion is the same; none of the candidates with an ambiguous label qualified for the November ballot.

One suggestion I recently wrote about would use the Top-Four. The Top-Two and the next two that received at least 20% of the vote.











NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


     
 
 


This post first appeared on The Independent View, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Top-Two Systems in CA and WA in 2016 Bar All Minor Party Candidates from November Ballot with One Process Exception

×

Subscribe to The Independent View

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×