Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Nazism Has Been Repackaged as "Conservatism" Part 4 - More Examples Of Eugenics (War On Various Segments Of American Society... Because They Disagree With Thier Nazi Policies.... If Caught or Facing Backlash Saying "We Should Be Nice &/Or Respectful" Is How They Divert Attention From Thier Crimes)

Background:
1. BREAKING: Nazism Has Been Repackaged As "Conservatism" Part 1 - GOP And Fox News Lie The Way Hitler Explained
2. Nazism Has Been Repackaged as "Conservatism" Part 2 - Eugenics (The Control Of Population To Weed Out Undesirables)
3. Nazism Has Been Repackaged as "Conservatism" Part 3 - The Pattern Of Unquestioned Obedience To Ones Leader Is The Same For The GOP & Trump's Followers As It Was For The Nazis & Hitler!

This post outlines some more examples of Nazi-like Eugenics being carried out by the right wing in the name of "conservatism" with comparisons and further research articles to prove that the right are indeed pushing a very Nazi-like form of eugenics in America.

Reminder: Nazi Eugenics

Hitler, other Nazis and some German academics were also avid believers in eugenic pseudo-science. They thought of German society as a sick organism, its bloodstream contaminated by degenerate and undesirable elements. Those ‘contaminating’ Germany were the racially impure, the physically disabled, the mentally infirm, the criminally minded and the sexually aberrant.The Nazis believed the state should intervene to improve the health of its society – first to identify its contaminating elements, then to restrict their growth, then to eliminate them. This required difficult and unpalatable policies – but the Nazis justified it with eugenics theories and references to social Darwinism (the ‘survival of the fittest’).

Groups our homegrown Nazi movement (dubbed "conservatism") are discriminating against;

Flashback to Nazi Germany...

PERSECUTION OF ROMA (GYPSIES) IN PREWAR GERMANY, 1933–1939


Flash forward to Present Day Nazi Right Wing...

Conservative media outlets stoke fears that “gypsies” are coming to America and defecating in the streets


Right-wing media outlets are using a local story about a community of 40 Roma seeking asylum in California, Pennsylvania to fearmonger about immigration by hyping claims the Roma are beheading chickens and defecating in public.

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports on community of 40 Roma seeking asylum in Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: “Romanians seeking asylum are in California, Pa. as part of U.S. Immigration program.” On July 14, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported on a community of 40 Roma immigrants in California, Pennsylvania, who “said they came to America to escape persecution in their Bucharest-area homes,” and “have been processed through U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and have been released as part of the government’s Alternative to Detention program.” The local city council in the small city said they had no warning that the immigrants would be coming to their town, but noted that “there have been no instances of violence or aggression, and the immigrants involved in minor infractions have been duly cited and paid their fines”:
Most of the 40 or so Romanians who have moved to this community in the past two months do not speak English well, if at all. They do not know American customs and are unfamiliar with codes of conduct.
And they had no idea that their sudden arrival would upset so many of the residents of this small town 35 miles south of Pittsburgh.
More than 150 residents packed California borough council's municipal meeting room Thursday evening to voice concerns about the influx of the Romanian refugees.
The Romanians, who said they came to America to escape persecution in their Bucharest-area homes, have been processed through U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and have been released as part of the government’s Alternative to Detention program, which monitors flight from other nations. They are members of the group known as Roma, or gypsies, and are distinct from ethnic Romanians. Roma are minorities in many European states and often face prejudice and discrimination.'
The federal program allows the immigrants find temporary homes, a cheaper and more humane alternative to keeping them in detention.
[...]
Angry residents at Thursday’s meeting said the newcomers throw trash around, park their cars in yards, disobey traffic rules, and are disruptive in markets. Others said that they’ve seen Romanians killing chickens and children defecating in public.
[...]
Council members, the borough administrator and police Chief Richard Encapera said they had no warning that the immigrants were coming and have had difficulty contacting federal authorities for assistance and explanations.
But they also said there have been no instances of violence or aggression, and the immigrants involved in minor infractions have been duly cited and paid their fines. [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 7/18/17]

Right-wing media uses Pittsburgh Post-Gazette report to push stories about “gypsy” public defecation, littering, beheading chickens

FoxNews.com: “Immigrants defecate in streets, behead chickens, angry Pennsylvania residents say.” A FoxNews.com article headlined, “Immigrants defecate in streets, behead chickens, angry Pennsylvania residents say,” highlighted problems the immigrants had assimilating in the local area. And while the article did highlight some positive interactions between the Roma and California, Pennsylvania residents, the report mainly focused on claims that “some residents of a Pennsylvania town are upset by Romanian immigrants who they have accused of defecating in public and beheading chickens”:
Some residents of a Pennsylvania town are upset by Romanian immigrants who they have accused of defecating in public and beheading chickens.
Residents in California, Pennsylvania – about 35 miles south of Pittsburgh – are angered by the alleged actions of the Romanian immigrants, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported.
Residents have accused the immigrants of throwing around trash, disobeying traffic laws, defecating in public, being disruptive in markets and killing chickens, according to the Post-Gazette.
“What I’ve seen is men and children – never usually the women – the men and the children dropping their pants in the middle of the street, defecating, pulling their pants up and going on their way,” Dawne Roberts told WTAE-TV. [FoxNews.com, 7/14/17]
Breitbart: “Pennsylvania residents protest Romanian immigrants ‘defecating and killing chickens’ in public.” A July 14 Breitbart report cited the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s report and focused on claims by residents that “a group of reportedly undocumented Romanian immigrants … are defecating on the streets and publicly beheading chickens”:
A group of reportedly undocumented Romanian immigrants have caused controversy for residents in a Pennsylvania town, who say their new neighbors are defecating on the streets and publicly beheading chickens.
“What I’ve seen is men and children — never usually the women — the men and the children dropping their pants in the middle of the street, defecating, pulling their pants up and going on their way,” resident Dawne Roberts told Pittsburgh’s Action 4 News.
Another resident reported littering and rampant speeding. Now, more than 600 California, Pa, residents have signed a petition demanding that the Romanian immigrants cease their destructive behavior.
Town official and borough administrator Dr. Richard Martin said the immigrants were relocated to his town, without warning, by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as part of a program called Alternative to Detention. [Breitbart, 7/14/17]
The Blaze: “Community outraged after feds move in Romanian ‘gypsies’ -- defecating in streets, trash in yards.” On July 16, The Blaze cited the Post-Gazette’s report, and focused on complaints citing “trash in yards, disruptions in town markets, children and men defecating in public streets, and immigrants cutting off the heads of chickens in public areas”:
Residents in California, Pennsylvania, a small borough of the Pittsburgh metropolitan area, have said they are outraged after the federal government moved 40 Romanian “gypsies” into the town of 7,000 as part of the government’s Alternative to Detention program.
On Thursday, more than 150 residents attended a community meeting about the immigrants, who residents say have failed to assimilate to American customs and norms. The residents cited trash in yards, disruptions in town markets, children and men defecating in public streets, and immigrants cutting off the heads of chickens in public areas, according to a report by WTAE-TV. None of the immigrants, who are undocumented, have been charged with any other serious criminal offenses.
“We’re a very diverse town, we’re very open, but they aren’t assimilating to our laws,” said Pam Duricic, a resident of California, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported. “We are understanding that these are immigrants. But this is not the same scenario as our grandparents. They didn’t come here to raise havoc.” [The Blaze, 7/16/17]
Gateway Pundit: “Residents of Small Pennsylvania Town Outraged By Immigrants Defecating in Streets, Beheading Chickens.” A July 17th post for The Gateway Pundit highlighted the Post-Gazette’s report, writing “Romanian gypsies in the United States have been in the news lately, as a Utah couple belonging to the community allegedly murdered their 3-year-old daughter”:
When a country is gracious enough to welcome you, conventional wisdom would say you treat its citizens and property with respect. Perhaps that’s demanding too much from a group of Romanian gypsies relocated to a small Pennsylvania town by the U.S. government. The Romanian gypsies are reportedly defecating in the streets and beheading chickens, leaving residents fuming.
[...]
Romanian gypsies in the United States have been in the news lately, as a Utah couple belonging to the community allegedly murdered their 3-year-old daughter. [Gateway Pundit, 7/17/17]
Tucker Carlson: “There are a lot of news stories … where groups of Roma settle in a new community and then defecate on playgrounds or sidewalks or on their front steps.” In a July 17 segment on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight, host Tucker Carlson hyped reports that “integration is not going well” for Roma asylum-seekers in Pennsylvania, claiming the community has “little regard either for the law or public decency.” After claiming “there are a lot of news stories about this from around the world -- where groups of Roma settle in a new community and then defecate on playgrounds or sidewalks or on their front steps,” Tucker argued, “This seems to me like a hostile act”:





TUCKER CARLSON (HOST): Well, in the last two months, several dozen Roma, more commonly known as "Gypsies" have been settled in California, Pennsylvania by the federal government. The Roma are seeking asylum saying they suffered racism in their native Romania. Integration is not going well. According to residents, they have little regard either for the law or public decency. Citizens say they defecate in public, chop the heads off chickens, leave trash everywhere and more.
[...]
I've spent time around the Roma and I've never heard anybody say they were violent, so that seems right to me. But I have heard a lot of people mention, and I'm just -- I hate to say it, but public defecation, there are a lot of news stories about this from around the world -- I'm serious, going back a long time in the U.K. and here where groups of Roma settle in a new community and then defecate on playgrounds, or sidewalks, or on their front steps. That seems to me a hostile act. Basically what you're saying --these are countries that have indoor plumbing, like, there are options. When you do that, you are saying "We reject you, and your mores."
[...]
GEORGE ELI: I've never witnessed any of my family do such a thing, and the way you're making it sound, with all due respect, or the way the papers are making it sound, is like they are doing it in protest, if, in fact, it's happening. I know things -- I'm here to talk about --
CARLSON: Well, lots of people over a number of different years -- I mean, there are photographs of it actually online. [Fox News, Tucker Carlson Tonight, 7/17/17]
Alex Jones: “They're crapping in the streets,” and “at least Tucker Carlson said ‘Gypsies coming to America.’” On the July 18 edition of his radio show, Alex Jones read from a FoxNews.com article and complained that, “Not even Fox News will tell you in the article [The Roma community are] gypsies,” and added “at least Tucker Carlson said ‘gypsies coming to America,’” referring to Carlson’s Fox News report.



Flashback to Nazi Germany...

How the Nazis Destroyed the First Gay Rights MovementThe history of LGBTQ rights is not a record of constant progress.

The first LGBTQ liberation movement
In the 1920s, Berlin had nearly 100 gay and lesbian bars or cafes. Vienna hadabout a dozen gay cafes, clubs and bookstores. In Paris, certain quarters were renowned for open displays of gay and trans nightlife. Even Florence, Italy, had its own gay district, as did many smaller European cities.
Films began depicting sympathetic gay characters. Protests were organized against offensive depictions of LGBTQ people in print or on stage. And media entrepreneurs realized there was a middle-class gay and trans readership to whom they could cater.
Partly driving this new era of tolerance were the doctors and scientists who started looking at homosexuality and “transvestism” (a word of that era that encompassed transgender people) as a natural characteristic with which some were born, and not a “derangement.” The story of Lili Elbe and the first modern sex change, made famous in the recent film “The Danish Girl,” reflected these trends.
For example, Berlin opened its Institute for Sexual Research in 1919, the place where the word “transsexual” was coined, and where people could receive counseling and other services. Its lead doctor, Magnus Hirschfeld, also consulted on the Lili Elbe sex change.
Connected to this institute was an organization called the “Scientific-Humanitarian Committee.” With the motto “justice through science,” this group of scientists and LGBTQ people promoted equal rights, arguing that LGBTQ people were not aberrations of nature.
Most European capitals hosted a branch of the group, which sponsored talks and sought the repeal of Germany’s “Paragraph 175.” Combining with other liberal groups and politicians, it succeeded in influencing a German parliamentary committee to recommend the repeal to the wider government in 1929.
The backlash
While these developments didn’t mean the end of centuries of intolerance, the 1920s and early ‘30s certainly looked like the beginning of the end. On the other hand, the greater “out-ness” of gay and trans people provoked their opponents.
A French reporter, bemoaning the sight of uncloseted LGBTQ people in public, complained, “the contagion … is corrupting every milieu.” The Berlin police grumbled that magazines aimed at gay men – which they called “obscene press materials” – were proliferating. In Vienna, lectures of the “Scientific Humanitarian Committee” might be packed with supporters, but one was attacked by young men hurling stink bombs. A Parisian town councilor in 1933 called it “a moral crisis” that gay people, known as “inverts” at that time, could be seen in public.
“Far be it from me to want to turn to fascism,” the councilor said, “but all the same, we have to agree that in some things those regimes have sometimes done good… One day Hitler and Mussolini woke up and said, ‘Honestly, the scandal has gone on long enough’ … And … the inverts … were chased out of Germany and Italy the very next day.”
The ascent of Fascism
It’s this willingness to make a blood sacrifice of minorities in exchange for “normalcy” or prosperity that has observers drawing uncomfortable comparisons between then and now.
In the 1930s, the Depression spread economic anxiety, while political fights in European parliaments tended to spill outside into actual street fights between Left and Right. Fascist parties offered Europeans a choice of stability at the price of democracy. Tolerance of minorities was destabilizing, they said. Expanding liberties gave “undesirable” people the liberty to undermine security and threaten traditional “moral” culture. Gay and trans people were an obvious target.
What happened next shows the whiplash speed with which the progress of a generation can be thrown into reverse.
The nightmare
One day in May 1933, pristine white-shirted students marched in front of Berlin’s Institute for Sexual Research – that safe haven for LGBTQ people – calling it “Un-German.” Later, a mob hauled out its library to be burned. Later still, its acting head was arrested.
When Nazi leader Adolph Hitler needed to justify arresting and murdering former political allies in 1934, he said they were gay. This fanned anti-gay zealotry by the Gestapo, which opened a special anti-gay branch. During the following year alone, the Gestapo arrested more than 8,500 gay men, quite possibly using a list of names and addresses seized at the Institute for Sexual Research. Not only was Paragraph 175 not erased, as a parliamentary committee had recommended just a few years before, it was amended to be more expansive and punitive.
As the Gestapo spread throughout Europe, it expanded the hunt. In Vienna, it hauled in every gay man on police lists and questioned them, trying to get them to name others. The fortunate ones went to jail. The less fortunate went to Buchenwald and Dachau. In conquered France, Alsace police worked with the Gestapo to arrest at least 200 men and send them to concentration camps. Italy, with a fascist regime obsessed with virility, sent at least 300 gay men to brutal camps during the war period, declaring them “dangerous for the integrity of the race.”
The total number of Europeans arrested for being LGBTQ under fascism is impossible to know because of the lack of reliable records. But a conservative estimate is that there were many tens of thousands to one hundred thousandarrests during the war period alone.
Under these nightmare conditions, far more LGBTQ people in Europe painstakingly hid their genuine sexuality to avoid suspicion, marrying members of the opposite sex, for example. Still, if they had been prominent members of the gay and trans community before the fascists came to power, as Berlin lesbian club owner Lotte Hahm was, it was too late to hide. She was sent to a concentration camp.
In those camps, gay men were marked with a pink triangle. In these places of horror, men with pink triangles were singled out for particular abuse. They were mechanically raped, castrated, favored for medical experiments and murderedfor guards’ sadistic pleasure even when they were not sentenced for “liquidation.” One gay man attributed his survival to swapping his pink triangle for a red one – indicating he was merely a Communist. They were ostracized and tormented by their fellow inmates, too.


Flash forward to Present Day Nazi Right Wing...

Civil rights expert: Trump's latest attack on Transgender Americans is "part of a pattern"Maya Harris: “In the broader context, this is part of a pattern of actually removing protections and undermining the rights of LGBT people”

STEPHANIE RHULE (HOST): You’re a civil rights attorney, what's your take on this? 
SEEMA IYER: It's shocking because, your question was why now, right? The policy has been that if you're openly transgender and you're able to serve, you can serve. So when you say why now, I am suspecting that perhaps there was some impetus, that something happened on the battlefield or something happened during training to cause other members of the military or civilians some type of harm, and then there would be a reason to change the policy. But without a reason to change the policy, there's no reason to change it except for the fact that he's looking for a distraction from Russiagate, right? 
MAYA HARRIS: But, I mean, you have to also put this in the broader context as well, which is this is part of a pattern. At the beginning of the administration, the administration also stepped back on the protection of transgender students, and so I think that you really do have to also put it in the broader context. I'm sure there's no doubt that the timing of this could potentially be because there's a reason or because it helps to show the base that don't worry, I'm still working on your agenda even though I'm berating your beloved attorney general, you know, in public. But in the broader context, this is part of a pattern of actually removing protections and undermining the rights of LGBT people.
Related:
CNN: Trump to reinstate US military ban on transgender people
Previously:
Before Trump banned transgender people from serving in military, here's who praised him as pro-LGBTQ
CNN Pentagon reporter: Trump banning transgender troops “in any capacity” means Pentagon may have to "go on a search" and purge them
Despite the most anti-LGBT platform ever, pundits tout Trump as a "champion" of LGBT causes

EXCLUSIVE - TRANSGENDER VETERANS REACT TO TRUMP'S TRANS MILITARY BA 7/26/2017 Transgender veterans join Trevor to discuss President Trump's ban on trans people in the military and unpack the real-life impact the decision will have on service members.
Trump's trans military ban eschews years of research in favor of junk science from a hate group

Trump announced decision to reimplement a ban on transgender military service in a series of tweets

Trump tweeted his decision to reimplement a ban on transgender people from serving in U.S. military, citing “tremendous medical costs” and “disruption.” In a series of tweets published on July 26, President Donald Trump said that the United States will no longer “accept or allow” transgender people to serve in the military. Trump continued, “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail.” [Twitter, 7/26/17, 7/26/17, 7/26/17]
AP: Pentagon officials were caught off guard by Trump’s early morning tweets, which “did not say what would happen to transgender people already in the military.” According to The Associated Press, transgender people have openly served in the armed forces since June 2016, when then-Defense Secretary Ash Carter lifted a prior ban. The Associated Press reported that Pentagon staff, including those serving under current Defense Secretary Jim Mattis “appeared to have been caught off guard by Trump’s tweets.” The article stated that defense officials estimated that there are up to 250 service members in the process of transitioning within the Pentagon system, adding that the fate of those who are already on active duty is unclear at this point. [The Associated Press, 7/26/17]

Anti-LGBTQ hate group Family Research Council estimated in a recent report, amplified in right-wing media, that trans-inclusive military service would cost $1.9 billion to $3.7 billion over a decade

Family Research Council: Over the next 10 years, allowing transgender people to serve in the military could cost “as much as $1.9 to $3.7 billion.” Anti-LGBTQ hate group Family Research Council (FRC) published a report in July by senior policy fellow Peter Sprigg that claimed the cost of allowing transgender people to serve in the military would actually be up to 8 times higher than previous estimates. Included in this total was both “direct medical costs and the cost of potential lost time of deployable service.” Just a few days before the report’s release, FRC began to run political ads that claimed health care costs for transgender service members would compromise military spending and that featured personal photos of transgender former soldier Chelsea Manning. [Family Research Council, accessed 7/26/17, 7/24/17; HuffPost, 7/20/17]
Right-wing media outlets amplified FRC’s exaggerated projections on the cost of allowing transgender people to openly serve in the military. Right-wing media outlets including Barbwire, CBN News, and Newsmax provided a platform for FRC representatives to spread misinformation under the guise of “research” and to help bolster the organization’s claims. [Barbwire, 7/23/17; CBN News, 7/24/17; Newsmax 7/25/17]

Numerous studies found that removing the ban on trans military service would not impact readiness, incur minimal costs, and Defense Department said a decision that was made carefully

Leading researchers on trans military service: “There is no compelling medical reason for the ban on service,” and health care for trans service members “should be managed using the same standards that apply to all others.” After conducting a review of 18 countries that allow transgender troops to serve openly, along with a review of Department of Defense policies, leading researchers and experts published a 2014 report on transgender military service in a peer-reviewed academic journal concluding that there is “no compelling medical reason” for a ban on transgender people serving in the military. They also found that any associated medical care costs should be “managed using the same standards that apply to all others,” saying removing the ban “would improve health outcomes, enable commanders to better care for their troops, and reflect the military’s commitment to providing outstanding medical care for all military personnel.” An article published the following year estimated that a repeal of the ban would cost the military approximately $5.6 million annually to provide transition-related health care for active personnel. [Medical Aspects of Transgender Military Service, Sage Journals, 8/19/14; Palm Center, 3/14/14; New England Journal of Medicine, 9/17/15]
Rand Corporat


This post first appeared on Culture & Society, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Nazism Has Been Repackaged as "Conservatism" Part 4 - More Examples Of Eugenics (War On Various Segments Of American Society... Because They Disagree With Thier Nazi Policies.... If Caught or Facing Backlash Saying "We Should Be Nice &/Or Respectful" Is How They Divert Attention From Thier Crimes)

×

Subscribe to Culture & Society

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×